Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 32–53
© Levenkova A. Y., Trifonova I. S., Zemlyanova M. P., Muraveva N. G., 2024
UDC: 
159.947.5+316.628+378.147

Study of International Relations students’ motivation: Assessing the effectiveness of educational process management via Action Research strategy [In English]

Levenkova A. Y. 1 (Tyumen, Russian Federation), Trifonova I. S. 1 (Tyumen, Russian Federation), Zemlyanova M. P. 1 (Tyumen, Russian Federation), Muraveva N. G. 1 (Tyumen, Russian Federation)
1 University of Tyumen
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 49
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article raises the problem of increasing motivation among university students in learning their major. Despite the fact that a large number of research articles are devoted to the problem of motivation, the issue of assessing the effectiveness of educational process management as one of the key factors in creating a motivating educational environment, remains insufficiently studied. The aim of this study is to determine and describe an effective strategy of intervention and external support for students majoring in “International Relations” in order to increase motivation in learning their academic major via Action Research.
Materials and Methods. The methodology is based on Activity theory, person-oriented approach, educational environment assessment, literature review, project-based learning, role-plays and Action Research, as well as on quantitative, qualitative and interpretive research. An analytical review has been carried out in order to identify methods and technologies that can be used to increase motivation to educational activities. Quantitative and qualitative methods include two surveys with subsequent interpretation of the results obtained and provide the basis for developing and testing the strategy of assessing the effectiveness of educational process management.
Results. The results of the surveys and their interpretation analysis have demonstrated a high level of student interest in English as a foreign language yet with an insufficient level of motivation for their major, as well as the students’ assessment of professional role-playing games as an effective and emotionally comfortable form of education. Based on Action Research and project-based learning the authors developed an action strategy, substantiated the principles of its implementation, the degree of intervention and external support while maintaining psychological comfort and the level of student autonomy. The authors found that increased involvement is also determined by the freedom to choose the focus of the project, a meaningful professional context, successful team work and effective management of the educational process. The results of the intervention helped the authors to develop recommendations for replicating and scaling up the experience gained.
Conclusions. In conclusion, inferences are made about the importance of effective external management for increasing motivation among the students. It has been proven that a sufficient level of intervention in the educational process and external support allow for higher degree of engagement and motivation in learning majors. Conclusions are also made about the Action Research method as a basis for effective management of the educational process, solving didactic problems, adjusting teaching interventions and assessing the results obtained.

Keywords: 

Motivation; Educational process management; Action Research; Intervention; Project-based learning; Professional role-plays; International Relations (IR)

For citation:
Levenkova A. Y., Trifonova I. S., Zemlyanova M. P., Muraveva N. G. Study of International Relations students’ motivation: Assessing the effectiveness of educational process management via Action Research strategy [In English]. Science for Education Today, 2024, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 32–53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2402.02
References: 
  1. Laura-De La Cruz K. M., Noa-Copaja S. J., Turpo-Gebera O., Montesinos-Valencia C. C. Bazбn-Velasquez S. M., Pйrez-Postigo G. S. Use of gamification in English learning in higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2023, vol. 13 (2), pp. 480–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1740 
  2. Genç Ersoy B., Göl Dede D. Developing writing skills, writing attitudes and motivation through educational games: Action research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 2022, vol. 9 (3), pp. 569–589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1089781
  3. Çalışkan M., Serçe H., Uysal H., Wei T. Developing students’ positive affective entry characteristics towards mathematics: An action research study. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 2022, vol. 6 (1), pp. 189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2022.189 
  4. Badeo J. M. O., Ong Kian Koc B. C. U. Use of comic-based learning module in physics in enhancing students’ achievement and motivation. Science Education International, 2021,vol. 32 (2), pp. 131–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i2.6
  5. Yarhands D. A., Dogbe C. S. K., Asiedu-Addo S. K. Enhancing performance in mathematics through motivation, peer assisted learning, and teaching quality: The mediating role of student interest. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2022, vol. 18 (2), pp. em2072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11509
  6. Ben Abu Y., Kribushi R. Can electronic board increase the motivation of students to study mathematics? Contemporary Educational Technology, 2022,vol. 14 (3), pp. ep364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11807 
  7. Banegas D. L., Low R. J. Creative writing for publication: an action research study of motivation, engagement, and language development in Argentinian secondary schools. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2021, vol. 11 (3), pp. 401–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.3.5
  8. Hugerat M., Kortam N., Kassom F., Algamal S., Asli S. Improving the motivation and the classroom climate of secondary school biology students using problem-based – jigsaw discussion (PBL-JD) Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2021, vol. 17 (12), pp. em2036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11304 
  9. Gutiérrez-Huancayo V. R. Enhancing oral skills and motivation through role-playing activities in medical students. European Journal of Educational Research, 2022, vol. 11(4), pp. 2139–2151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2139

10. Bakhsh I., Soomro A., Bughio F. Increasing motivation at university level: A paradigm of action research. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2015, vol. 6 (1), pp. 140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0601.17

11. Ivanova M., Mekeko N., Kashkarova T., Shlenskaya N. The influence of the teaching style of communication on the motivation of students to learn foreign languages. Journal of Language and Education, 2019, vol. 5 (2), pp. 67–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.9695 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39241394   

12. Shin M., Bolkan S. Intellectually stimulating students' intrinsic motivation: The mediating influence of student engagement, self-efficacy, and student academic support. Communication Education, 2021, vol. 70 (2), pp. 146–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1828959 

13. Saito K., Dewaele J. M., Hanzawa K. A Longitudinal Investigation of the relationship between motivation and late second language speech learning in classroom settings. Language and Speech, 2017, vol. 60 (4), pp. 614–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830916687793 

14. Shin M. Effects of project-based learning on students’ motivation and self-efficacy. English Teaching, 2018, vol. 73 (1), pp. 95–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.95 

15. Bytyqi B. Project –based learning: A teaching approach where learning comes alive. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 2021, vol. 9 (4), pp. 775−777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104775B 

16. Revelle K. Z., Wise C. N., Duke N. K., Halvorsen A. L. Realizing the promise of project-based learning. The Reading Teacher, 2020, vol. 73 (6), pp. 697–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1874 

17. Tran T. Q., Tran T. N. P. Attitudes toward the use of project-based learning: A case study of Vietnamese high school students. Journal of Language and Education, 2020, vol. 6 (3), pp. 140–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10109

18. Baker J., Goodboy A. The choice is yours: The effects of autonomy-supportive instruction on students’ learning and communication. Communication Education, 2019, vol. 68(1), pp. 80–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1536793

19. Reeve J. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2013, vol. 105 (3), pp. 579–595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690 

20. Andreev V. V., Gildenberg B. M., Gorbunov V. I., Evdokimova O. K., Trofimova I. G. The principles of the implementation of gaming technologies in a blended learning environment in a technical university. Education and Self Development, 2022,vol. 17 (2), pp. 51–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26907.esd.17.1.04  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49022935

21. Miller L., Hafner C. A., Fun C. N. K. Project-based learning in a technologically enhanced learning environment for second language learners: Students' perceptions. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2012, vol. 9 (2), pp. 183–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2012.9.2.183

22. Oranga J., Gisore B. N. Action research in education. Open Access Library Journal, 2023, vol. 10 (7), pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110306

23. Enosh G., Tzafrir S. S., Stolovy T. The development of client violence questionnaire (CVQ). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2014, vol. 9 (3), pp. 273–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814525263 

24. Dawadi S., Shrestha S., Giri R. A. Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2021, vol. 2 (2), pp. 25–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20

25. Terrell S. R. Mixed-methods research methodologies. Qualitative Report, 2012, vol. 17 (1), pp. 254–280. DOI: http://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1819

26. Wilkinson I. A. G., Staley B. On the pitfalls and promises of using mixed methods in literacy research: Perceptions of reviewers. Research Papers in Education, 2019, vol. 34 (1), pp. 61–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1402081

 

Date of the publication 30.04.2024