Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 141–156
© Shaimardanova E. K., Ryabova S. V., Iumaguzhina R. R., Battalova Z. D., Gareeva S. A., 2023
UDC: 
303.214+316.6+378.126

Evaluating performance indicators of scientific schools in the pedagogical university

Shaimardanova E. K. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation), Ryabova S. V. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation), Iumaguzhina R. R. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation), Battalova Z. D. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation), Gareeva S. A. 1 (Ufa, Russian Federation)
1 Bashkir State Pedagogical University n.a. M. Akmulla
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 141
Abstract: 

Introduction. The authors investigate interrelated problems including the motivation of young people for involvement in scientific and research activities, on the one hand, and changes in scientific traditions of educational or scientific institutions determined by modern trends, on the other hand.
The purpose of this article is to evaluate the performance indicators of scientific schools at the pedagogical university, to identify the most effective criteria for evaluating the performance of scientific schools.
Materials and Methods. The research is based on the theoretical foundations of science studies, forming the idea of a scientific school as a formalized system of scientific views of the scientific community (M. G. Yaroshevsky, etc.).
The article analyses the problem of performance indicators for scientific schools with the main focus on Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmulla.
The sample included 12 scientific schools in the fields of humanities and natural sciences.
In the article, we considered such qualimetric indicators of the effectiveness of scientific schools as the number of published monographs, research articles and defended dissertations.
Results. We found that in 2018-2022 the publication efficiency of the academic staff at the Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmulla increased, but this criterion was unstable with the publication efficiency of scientific schools.
Data analysis shows that the main performance indicators do not demonstrate stability – a steady increase or decrease. The development of the scientific school determines the mechanism of accumulation of effectiveness for each indicator for several years, which is determined both by internal factors (the system of encouraging academic staff based on the results of research activities; increase in number of young researchers: master’s and doctoral students) and external ones.
Thus, we found that the most effective criterion for assessing the activities of scientific schools is evaluating a set of qualimetric indicators, as well as evaluating external factors including changes in the rules of dissertation councils, in scientific publications ratings, in the system of grant support for research activities, etc.
Conclusions. In conclusion, the authors summarize the results of evaluating the performance indicators for scientific schools at the pedagogical University, emphasizing the most effective assessment criteria.

Keywords: 

Research activity; Scientific school; Pedagogical university; Performance indicators of research activities; Publication efficiency; Motivation of young people; Change of scientific traditions

For citation:
Shaimardanova E. K., Ryabova S. V., Iumaguzhina R. R., Battalova Z. D., Gareeva S. A. Evaluating performance indicators of scientific schools in the pedagogical university. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 141–156. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2305.07
References: 
  1. Labzina I. A. Prospects of involvement of modern students in research activities (on the materials of the Tula region). Historical and Socio-Educational Thought, 2018, vol. 10 (6–1), pp. 158–165. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2018-10-6/1-158-165  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36774755
  2. Thoonen E. E. J., Sleegers P. J. C., Peetsma T. T. D., Oort F. J. Can teachers motivate students to learn? Educational Studies, 2010, vol. 37 (3), pp. 345–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2010.507008
  3. Pokrovskaya N. N., Margulyan Ya. A. Citizen science as a form of social empowerment of youth and volunteers' engagement in research in the context of mobilized economy of knowledge. Sociology and Law, 2022, vol. 14 (3), pp. 256–273. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2022-3-256-273   URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49457919
  4. Lewis R. E., Heckman R. J. Talent management: A critical review. Human Resource Management Review, 2006, vol. 16 (2), pp. 139-154.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.001  
  5. Woelfle M., Olliaro P., Todd M. H. Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 2011, vol. 3 (10), pp. 745-748.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149  
  6. Melnichuk M. V., Gruzina Yu. M., Firsova I. A. Formation of scientific and educational values in the system of youth motivation. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2019, vol. 12 (6), pp. 260–275. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2019.6.66.15  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41753697
  7. Jang H. Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008, vol. 100 (4), pp. 798–811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012841
  8. Yarovenko E. E. Psychological characteristics of research students: self-disclosure of abilities, self-concrpt, motivation. The Territory of New Opportunities. Bulletin of Vladivostok State University, 2022, vol. 14 (4), pp. 139–150. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24866/VVSU/2949-1258/2022-4/139-150  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50735934
  9. Dianova Yu. A. Innovative technologies in extracurricular research and project work with university students. Humanities and Education, 2022, vol. 13 (2), pp. 39–45. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.51609/2079-3499_2022_13_02_39  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49295319

10. Nikitina V. V., Chernega E. V. Personal interests transformation in students of it-specialties during educational process at the university. Prospects of Science and Education, 2018, no. 4, pp. 78–83. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35534454 

11. Tsibizova T. Yu. On the socialization of schoolchildren in the system of pre-university training. Design and Technology, 2012, no. 28, pp. 130–135. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18794022

12. Prokopov N. I., Ivanov S. Yu., Tomashevskaya V. S., Antonyuk S. N., Ivanova D. V. Scientific potential of a modern university: Prospects for preparation of scientific and pedagogical personnel via postgraduate education. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, 2020, no. 1, pp. 14–23. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2020 .1.1  URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42444059 

13. Castelló M., Pardo M., Sala-Bubaré A., Suñe-Soler N. Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 2017, vol. 74 (6), pp. 1053–1068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9

14. Babosova E. S. The role of scientific schools in development of motivation of the youth to scientific activity. Sociological Almanac, 2010, no. 1, pp. 204–209. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19042217

15. Dolzhenko R. A., Karpilyansky V. A., Khadi R. A., Didenko A. S. Young scientists' motivation for the research activity in Russian regional universities. Education and Science, 2019, vol. 21 (9), pp. 122–153. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-9-122-153  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41367677

16. Kapranova V. A. Scientific school as a social phenomenon: Essence, typology, patterns of development. Bulletin of the Belarusian State Pedagogical University. Series 1. Pedagogy. Psychology. Philology, 2015, no. 1, pp. 11–14. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37403777

17. Morgun A. N., Ettinger A. P. Assessing the performance of scientific schools using bibliometric mapping. Methodology and Technology of Continuing Professional Education, 2021, no. 1, pp. 38–53. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24075/MTCPE.2021.004 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46502231

18. Ramsey G. A., Howe R. W. An analysis of research on instructional procedures in secondary school science. Part I Outcomes of Instruction. The Science Teacher, 1969, vol. 36 (3), pp. 62–70. URL:  https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED026287.pdf

19. Sin C. Epistemology, sociology, and learning and teaching in physics. Science Education, 2014, vol. 98 (2), pp. 342–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21100   

20. Ojediran I. A., Oludipe D. I., Ehinder O. J. Impact of laboratory-based instructional intervention on the learning outcomes of low performing senior secondary students in physics. Scientific Research, 2014, vol. 5 (4), pp. 197–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.54029   

21. Williams C., Stanisstreet M., Spall K., Boyes E., Dickson D. Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 2003, vol. 38 (4), pp. 324–329. DOI:    https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/38/4/306

22. Teng X., Yang H. Research on the construction of open laboratory in universities based on the cultivation of innovative and entrepreneurial talents. Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Education, Management, Arts, Economics and Social Science (ICEMAESS 2018), 2018, vol. 264, pp. 207–210.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icemaess-18.2018.42 

23. Egerev D. S., Egerev S. V., Ladny A. O., Zakharova S. A., Polikarpova N. V. Leading scientific schools: Experience 1996–2008. The Science. Innovation. Education, 2009, vol. 4 (1), pp. 241–264. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20789342 

24. Radina N. K. Limits of reproducing scientific traditions in regional schools of thought (on the material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s school of thought). Psychological Science and Education, 2018, vol. 23 (5), pp. 124–132. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2018230512 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36944538

25. Paveleva T. Yu. Problems of modern science of Russian school. Social and Political Sciences, 2012, no. 1, pp. 156–161. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17339121  

Date of the publication 31.10.2023