Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 148–169
UDC: 
316.6+376.33+303.443.2

Structure and contents of hearing impaired university students’ epistemic competence within digital learning environment: Criteria and evaluation methods

Gareyev A. A. 1 (Izhevsk, Russia, Russian Federation), Ponomarenko E. P. 1 (Izhevsk, Russia, Russian Federation), Shishkina A. A. 1 (Izhevsk, Russia, Russian Federation), Krasavina Y. V. 1 (Izhevsk, Russia, Russian Federation)
1 Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. A range of international and Russian studies addressing teaching hearing impaired university students focus on their cognitive and psychological differences from their hearing peers. However, they rarely discuss extremely relevant issue of learning in a digital environment which has untapped educational potential for the deaf and hard-of-hearing. The purpose of this paper is to rationalize a multi-component structure and content of hearing impaired university students’ abilities and skills to learn effectively, also known as epistemic competence, within a digital environment.
Materials and Methods. The draft of the structure and content of this competence was designed relying on literature review, then improved and verified by means of the qualimetric approach, in particular, the procedures of expert group evaluation method.
Results. Using a questionnaire and self-assessment techniques, the authors identified factors determining the expertise in teaching deaf and hard-of-hearing students, the grade scale to evaluate the experts based on these factors has been designed, and 10 experts have been selected. The questionnaire aimed at improving and approving the structure (components) and content (criteria) of deaf and hard-of-hearing students’ epistemic competence in a digital learning environment have been designed and used in order to survey the experts. The authors rationalize the structure of the epistemic competence consisting of four components: motivation-based, cognitive, activity-based, and communicative. The content of components is presented as a list of criteria and evaluation methods for them.
Conclusions. The developed structure and content represent an attempt to standardize teaching and learning of hearing impaired students. It is concluded that the proposed structure provides a way to identify challenges deaf and hard-of-hearing students face in learning online, and thus contributes to more effective epistemic competence development.

Keywords: 

Competence structure; Epistemic competence; Deaf students; Hard-of-hearing students; Digital learning environment; Expert group evaluation; Questionnaire.

For citation:
Gareyev A. A., Ponomarenko E. P., Shishkina A. A., Krasavina Y. V. Structure and contents of hearing impaired university students’ epistemic competence within digital learning environment: Criteria and evaluation methods. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 148–169. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.07
References: 
  1. Saeed E., Mansoor Z., Ikram H. Usefulness of social model of disability for teaching visually impaired English language learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2022, vol. 4 (4), pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2022.4.4.1
  2. Novozhilova Т. N. Development of cognitive competence of hearing impaired students in inclusive education. Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, 2019, no. 2, pp. 185–192. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1997-0803-2019-10217 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39150270 
  3. Ponomarenko Е. P., Krasavina Yu. V., Zhuykova O. F., Serebryakova Yu. V. Specific features of intellectual and cognitive processes in hearing impaired students of technical university. Pedagogical Image, 2019, vol. 13 (4), pp. 664–675. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32343/2409-5052-2019-13-4-664-675 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41861839
  4. Lynn M. A., Templeton D. C., Ross A. D., Gehret A. U., Bida M., Sanger T. J., Pagano T. Successes and challenges in teaching chemistry to deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 2020, vol. 97 (9), pp. 3322–3326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00602
  5. Sutton H. Guide offers best practices for meeting the needs of deaf students during COVID-19 pandemic. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 2020, vol. 26 (4), pp. 9–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dhe.30938 
  6. Kuntze M., Branum-Martin L., Scott J. Pandemic effects on the reading trajectories of deaf and hard of hearing students: A pilot analysis. Reading and Writing, 2023, no. 36 (2), pp. 429–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10365-4 
  7. Thorén E., Öberg M., Wänström G., Andersson G., Lunner T. Internet access and use in adults with hearing loss. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2013, vol. 15 (5), pp. e91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2221
  8. Krasavina Yu. V., Ponomarenko Е. P., Serebryakova Yu. V., Zhuikova О. F. The use of information and communication technologies when teaching students with hearing impairment at a technical university. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2021, no. 4, pp. 418–435. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.4.28  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46673415 
  9. Zvonenko А. B. Genesis of the notion “educational and cognitive activity”. Pedagogy. Theory & Practice, 2021, vol. 6 (2), pp. 162–167. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/ped210029  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45635793  

10. Ng, W. Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education, 2012, vol. 59 (3), pp. 1065–1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016  URL: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/28001/1/1001996.pdf 

11. Roslyakova S. V. On essence and structure of epistemic competence. University Bulletin, 2012, no. 10, pp. 300–305. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18344983 

12. Kublitsakya Yu. G. Enrichment of the educational content, as the condition of students’ cognitive competence development. Modern Pedagogical Education, 2018, no. 1, pp. 42–45. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32736470 

13. Vlieghe J. Traditional and digital literacy. The literacy hypothesis, technologies of reading and writing, and the ‘grammatized’ body. Ethics and Education, 2015, vol. 10 (2), pp. 209–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2015.1039288  URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17449642.2015.1039288 

14. Green C. L. Digital literacies and the skills of the digital age. Learning in the Digital Age, 2020, pp. 111–131. URL: https://open.library.okstate.edu/learninginthedigitalage/chapter/digital-literacies-and-the-skills-of-the-digital-age/ 

15. Viluckiene J. The relationship between online social networking and offline social participation among people with disability in Lithuania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 185, pp. 453–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.413  URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815022065 

16. Maiorana-Basas M., Pagliaro C. M. Technology use among adults who are deaf and hard of hearing: A national survey. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2014, vol. 19 (3), pp. 400–410. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43666294 

17. Toofaninejad E., Zavaraki E. Z., Dawson S., Poquet O., Daramadi P. S. Social media use for deaf and hard of hearing students in educational settings: A systematic review of literature. Deafness and Educational International, 2017, vol. 19 (3–4), pp. 144–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2017.1411874  URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14643154.2017.1411874 

18. Shamsutdinova Yu. F. Communication with the involvement of hearing and deaf/hard of hearing people: Social media opportunities.Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, 2020, no. 5, pp. 54–76. (In Russian)  DOI: https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.5.2020.5476   URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44180415 

19. El-Soud M. A., Hassan A. E., Kandil M. S., Shohieb S. M. A proposed web based framework e-learning and dictionary system for deaf Arab students. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Sciences, 2010, vol. 10 (1), pp. 56–68. URL: https://goo.su/qv2Ww 

20. Thorén E. S., Öberg M., Andersson G., Lunner T. Internet interventions for hearing loss. American Journal of Audiology, 2015, vol. 24 (3), pp. 316–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0009 URL: https://pubs.asha.org/doi/abs/10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0009 

21. Kolzina А. G., Shikhova O. F., Gareyev A. A., Shikhov Yu. A., Rodríguez Bulnes M. G. Structure and content of professional teaching competence of in-company teachers at industrial enterprises. The Education and Science Journal, 2022, vol. 24 (4), pp. 40–78. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-4-40-78 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48302688   

22. Eremenko V. D., Pripachkin I. A., Shipko Yu. V., Gavrilenko A. V. A probabilistic approach to the assessment of the expert group quantitative composition. Air Forces. Theory and Practice, 2019, no. 9, pp. 15–20. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37214566 

23. Denisova S. A. Contents and structure of educational and informative competence of students of the direction “Linguistics”. Social-Economic Phenomena and Processes, 2014, vol. 9 (11), pp. 220–227. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22741249 

24. Green C. L. Personal learning networks: Defining and building a PLN. Learning in the Digital Age, 2020, pp. 91–98. URL: https://open.library.okstate.edu/learninginthedigitalage/chapter/personal-learning-networks_defining-and-building-a-pln/  

25. Varinova О. А. Features of the description of the social community of deaf people. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2020, no. 7, pp. 44–48. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2020.7.7  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43799459

Date of the publication 31.08.2023