Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 7–27
UDC: 
37.015.3+159.9

Problems of emergency distance learning: The point of view of education stakeholders

Kostina L. M. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation), Kalabina I. A. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation), Nikolaeva E. I. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation), Dunaevskaya E. B. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Herzen State pedagogical university
Abstract: 

Introduction. The urgent transition to distance learning all over the world during COVID-19 pandemic disclosed the problems of assessing the quality of the educational process, including the effectiveness of its organization, the availability of information for students and the peculiarities of supporting students in the process of knowledge acquisition. The purpose of this article is to summarize the problems that arose as part of the urgent transition to remote instruction experienced by education stakeholders: schoolchildren, teachers, schoolchildren’s parents, undergraduate and postgraduate students.
Materials and Methods. In order to obtain empirical data, questionnaires were created for each group of education stakeholders, which were submitted in Google forms and posted online. Responses were received from 307 parents, 114 schoolchildren, 175 undergraduate students, 54 postgraduate students and 14 secondary school teachers from different regions of the Russian Federation. The sample consisted of 664 people.
Results. The study revealed a range of problems that arose in the process of an urgent transition to distance learning for different education stakeholders. The schoolchildren were technically the worst off, 35% of whom studied using smartphones and tablets, and 36% shared a gadget with another family member. At the same time, students generally had a positive attitude towards distance learning. The greatest psychological problems were found in parents and teachers. Parents were forced to fulfill the duties of teachers for their children, with many complaining that this process was time consuming. Teachers also noted that they simultaneously played two roles in the process of distance learning: a teacher and a parent. Both parents and teachers described burnout symptoms as a result of participating in an activity that was unusual for them.
Conclusions. The study identified 4 types of problems faced by education stakeholders: technical, interpersonal, individual and existential. The students, despite the obvious organizational and technical problems, did not experience a negative attitude towards the distance learning process, perhaps because the whole burden of responsibility for learning outcomes fell on adults. A significant individual problem faced by teachers was role confusion, which led to burnout. It has been suggested that the reason for the existential problems seen in most adults is not due to distance learning but to unresolved family issues brought to light by distance learning.

Keywords: 

Problems of distance learning; Parents; Parental assistance; Students; Teachers-parents; Schoolchildren; Burnout

For citation:
Kostina L. M., Kalabina I. A., Nikolaeva E. I., Dunaevskaya E. B. Problems of emergency distance learning: The point of view of education stakeholders. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 7–27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2303.01
References: 
  1. Blinov V. I., Sergeev I. S., Esenina E. Yu. Sudden distance learning: The first month of emergency. Vocational Education and Labor Market, 2020, no. 2, pp. 6–33. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2307-4264-2020-10201  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42900392
  2. Dobrynina M. A., Pirogov A. I., Rastimeshina T. V. Pandemic challenges and responses of the Russian education system: Socio-political aspects. Bulletin of Russian International Academy of Turism, 2020, no. 4, pp. 86–93. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44571132
  3. Jelińska M., Paradowski M. B. Teachers' engagement in and coping with emergency remote instruction during COVID-19-induced school closures: A multi-national contextual perspective. Online Learning Journal, 2021, vol. 25 (1), pp. 303–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2492
  4. Tsai S., Machado P. E-learning, online learning, language learning, or distance learning: Unveiling the ambiguity in current terminology. Association for Computer Machinery: eLearn Magazine, 2002, vol. 2002 (7), pp. 3–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/566778.568597 
  5. Kaplan A. M., Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons, 2016, vol. 59 (4), pp. 441–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008
  6. Anderson T., Rivera V. P. A critical look at educational technology from a distance education perspective. Digital Education Review, 2020, vol. 37, pp. 208–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.208-229  
  7. Mukhtar K., Javed K., Arooj M., Sethi A. Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 2020, vol. 36, pp.  S27–S31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785 
  8. Kazakova A., Pashneva S. Foreign language teachers’ challenges of integrating technology into online classrooms during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Kursk and Kursk region. Actual Problems of Modern Foreign Language Education, 2021, no. 13, pp. 10. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=46156201
  9. Shnypko V. S. Distance learning: Lessons from COVID. School Technologies, 2021, no. 1, pp. 14–18. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=45735263
  10. Smelkova I. Y., Tuana E. N., Gubareva S. A., Krasnova I. A. Distance learning in the university foreign language environment through the eyes of Chinese students. Perspectives of Science and Education, 2021, vol. 5 (53), pp. 125–138. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.5.9 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47146543
  11. Kozina Zh. G. Distance physical training lessons: Myth or reality. Kaliningrad Bulletin of Education, 2020, no. 2, pp. 28–34. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=43120033
  12. Maltsev V. A., Maltsev K. V. Pandemic and education. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 2020, vol. 224 (4), pp. 402–415. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2020-224-4-402-415 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43984894
  13. Lizana P. A., Vega-Fernadez G. T. Teleworking during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Association between work hours, work-family balance and quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research. Public Health, 2021, vol. 18 (14), pp. 7566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147566
  14. Leonidova G. V., Valiakhmetov R. M., Baimurzina G. R., Babich L. V. Problems and prospects of distance learning in the estimates provided by teachers and schoolchildren's parents. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2020, vol. 13 (4), pp. 202–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.4.70.12  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44047632
  15. Magomedov R. R., Popova M. R., Makhnovskaya N. V. Teacher of physical culture in digitalization of education. World of Science, Culture, Education, 2020, no. 4, pp. 258–260. (in Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=43928834
  16. Hew K. F., Jia Ch., Gonda D. E., Bai Sh. Transitioning to the “new normal” of learning in unpredictable times: pedagogical practices and learning performance in fully online flipped classrooms. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2020, vol.  17  (1), pp. 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00234-x
  17. DeFlem M. The right to teach in a hyper-digital age: Legal protections for (post-) pandemic concerns. Society, 2021, vol. 58 (3), pp. 204–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00584-w
  18. Danko O. A., Enygin D. V., Midova V. O., Minasyan E. T. Distance learning introduced in tertiary education. Modern Pedagogical Education, 2020, no. 1, pp. 145–148. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47974113
  19. Hemati A. G., Moradi S. Job burnout in public and special schoolteachers. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2021, vol. 10 (2), pp. 63–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2021100205  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46343951
  20. Petrakova A.V., Kanonir T.N., Kulikova A.A., Orel E.A. Characteristics of teacher stress during distance learning imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Issues, 2021, no. 1, pp. 93–114. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=44871814
  21. Chernobay E. V., Davlatova M. A. Changing the professional roles of teachers in the context of distance learning for schoolchildren: An actual view. Pedagogika, 2020, vol. 84 (11), pp. 100–108. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44402203
  22. Pronicheva M. M. The role of occupational stress in the formation of social perception disorders among elementary and secondary school teachers. Psychology. Historical-Critical Reviews and Contemporary Research, 2020, vol. 9 (2–1), pp. 7–15. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2020.11.29.001 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43176550
  23. Vozdvizhenskaya A. V., Koroleva N. G., Lipatova E. G. Analysis of transition to a totally remote classroom: Psychological and methodological aspects. Teaching Methodology in Higher Education, 2020, vol. 9 (34), pp. 24–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18720/HUM/ISSN2227-8591.34.02  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44297032
Date of the publication 30.06.2023