Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, No.6, pp.26-36
UDC: 
373

Professional identification of pedagogical university graduates

Fortygina S. N. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation), Pavlova L. N. 1 (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation)
1 South-Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper is devoted to the problem of interrelation between professional identification and work motivation of pedagogical university graduates. The purpose of the study is to reveal the interrelation between the indicators of professional identification and the types of students’ work motivation.
Materials and Methods. The study is based on the following methodological approaches: system, activity, competence, information, process and axiological. These approaches have allowed the authors to consider the problem within the framework of initial teacher education. Therefore, the level of formation of professional competencies is considered as significant. The study explores professional identification of pedagogical university graduates using such research methods as analysis, synthesis, comparison and generalization; as well as the following methodologies: the methodology of studying the status of professional identity, the questionnaire of professional inclinations, the questionnaire of professional readiness, and the methodology of professional motivation. The degree of interrelation between the indicators of professional identification and the types of graduates’ work motivation was determined using the Pearson correlation criterion. The study involved 735 graduates of South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University.
Results. The results of the study revealed that students of South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University deliberately chose the path of professional development. More than a third of the respondents are inclined to work with people, which is significant for such professional fields as management, education and training; they are also inclined to planning and economic activities, requiring consistency and accuracy. The majority of the surveyed demonstrated high levels of professional readiness, corresponding to the "person-person" professional type. Correlation analysis has shown high indicators of professional identification, which are characterized by positive external motivation. It indicates that students are oriented towards achieving social prestige, receiving social guarantees and money earnings. External negative motivation of pedagogical university graduates is associated with rigid work organization and work regulations. The factor, contributing to successful and conscious professional identification of pedagogical university graduates, is the educational space of the university, which is a complex scientific and practical system.
Conclusions. The authors confirmed the hypothesis of the study that there is a correlation between pedagogical university graduates’ professional identification and types of their work motivation. It is established that high indicators of professional identification are associated with positive external motivation of senior full-time students at South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University. Low indicators of professional identification are associated with graduates’ ideas of their professional readiness: uncertainty, negative experience of work placements, and negative external influence.

Keywords: 

Professional self-determination; Professional identity; Professional readiness; Professional tendencies; Motivation of working life; Graduate of a pedagogical university; Professional competence.

References: 
  1. Cano-García F. J., Padilla-Muñoz E. M., Carrasco-Ortiz M. А. Personality and contextual variables in teacher burnout. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, vol. 38, issue 4, pp. 929–940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.018
  2. Jansen in de Wal J., den Brok P. J., Hooijer J. G., Martens R. L., van den Beemt A. Teachers' engagement in professional learning: Exploring motivational profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 2014, vol. 36, pp. 27–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.001
  3. Gottschling J., Hahn E., Maas H., Spinath F. M. Explaining the relationship between personality and coping with professional demands: Where and why do optimism, self-regulation, and self-efficacy matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, vol. 100, pp. 49–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.085
  4. Hrbackova К., Suchankova E. Self-Determination Approach to Understanding of Motivation in Students of Helping Professions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 217, pp. 688–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.120
  5. Kalymbetova E. K., Duisenbekov D. D., Arynbaeva G. M.,  Zholdassova M. K.,  Baimoldina L. O., Sadykova N. M. Psychological Features of Personality Training for Professional Activity. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 171, pp. 263–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.120
  6. Story P. A., Hart J. W., Stasson M. F., Mahoney J. M. Using a two-factor theory of achievement motivation to examine performance-based outcomes and self-regulatory processes. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, vol. 46, issue 4, pp. 391–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.023
  7. Valitova E., Starodubtsev V., Goryanova L. Formative Personalisation of Students’ Self-Determination and Employability. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 214, pp. 739–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.706
  8. Burtseva L. P. Pedagogical management of the development of self-processes among students in the educational process of the university. Basic Research, 2005, no. 3, pp. 82–83. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=10435423
  9. Glazyrina L. A., Pavlova L. N. On the issue of employment. Rector of the university, 2014, no. 3, pp. 14–19. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21858240.
  10. Kobysheva L. I., Krotova A. P. Self-Determination as a Condition for Professionalism Development of Future Teachers. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, 2012, no. 2, pp. 95–103. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17769273
  11. Kobysheva L. I. Psycho-Pedagogical Support of University Students’ Professional Self-Determination. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, 2014, no. 4, pp. 40–46. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22673894
  12. Kondakov I. M., Sukharev А. V. Methodological basis of foreign theories of professional development. Psychological Questions, 1989, no. 5, pp. 158–164. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22914310
  13. Pavlova L. N. The problem of implementation of the management competence of the teacher through the teachware of educating activity. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2015, no. 5-1 (112), pp. 39–43. (In Russian)  URL: https://elibrary.ru/full_text.asp?id=24365436
  14. Pakhtusova N. A., Gertsog G. A.  A Study of Professional Intentions of Graduates – Professional-Pedagogical University. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2016, no. 6, p. 437. (In Russian) URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27695265
  15. Pakhtusova N. A. Investigation of Employment Prospects for Graduates of Pedagogical University. Humanities, 2017, no. 3 (39), pp. 128–134. (In Russian) URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29924197
  16. Proshin I. A., Proshin D. I., Proshina R. D. Presentation of the model of a student as an intellectual management system. Academy of Professional Education, 2008, no. 4, pp. 20–26. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25849752
  17. Proshin D. I., Proshina R. D. Principles of the System Organization of Vocational Training at Higher School. Pedagogical Education and Science, 2009, no. 10, pp. 76–78. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17060346
  18. Sadyrin V. V., Yakovleva N. O., Trubaychuk L. V., Tyumaseva Z. I., Potapova M. V., Uvarina N. V., Sokolova N. A., Kolbin R. V., Glazyrina L. A. Professional socialization of graduates of the pedagogical universities on the basis of using modern technologies of networking. Monograph. Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2013, 293 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21531839.
  19. Ugarova M. G. Professional self-determination of students of the pedagogical university.  Bulletin of Nekrasov Kostroma State University, 2005, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 77–81. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21143901
  20. Kharlamova T. M. Professional self-determination of graduates of the Pedagogical University. Progress in Modern Natural Science, 2008, no. 2, pp. 64–66. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9947332
  21. Kharlamova T. M. Significant qualities of professionalism from the point of view of the employer and graduate of the pedagogical university. Modern High Technologies, 2008, no. 1, p. 20. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9926651
  22.  Deci E. L. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. Amsterdam, Elsevier Publ., 2004, pp. 437–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05613-3
  23.  DurksenT. L,. Klassen R. M., Daniels L. M. Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 67, pp. 53–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.011
  24. Ibănescu A. How Do Novice Specialists in Human Resources Develop their Professional Identity? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 187, pp. 596–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.111
  25.  Latygovskaya T., Bukharina Zh., Chubik A. Professionalism as a Generalized Typical Model of a Professional in the Higher Education System. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 206, pp. 374–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.068
Date of the publication 30.12.2017