Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, No.5, pp.159-175
UDC: 
371.134:004(07)

The possibilities of the digital gamification resources for supporting cognitive personality development

Soboleva E. V. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation)
1 Vyatka State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to solving the research problem of realizing the potential of gamification digital resources to support personal cognitive development. The purpose of the study is to identify possibilities for the effective use of gamification digital resources to support cognitive development of individuals.
Materials and Methods. The methodology of the research includes the analysis of psychological, educational, methodological and technical literature by Russian and foreign authors on using digital resources in cognition and learning. The author also relied on the methods of systematization and generalization of facts and concepts. The educational experiment consisted of the following empirical methods: observation, questionnaires, tests, analysis of students’ cognitive activities.
Results. Firstly, the author investigated the potential of modern digital technologies for developing all types of thought processes (formation of concepts, problem-solving, logic, etc.). Secondly, the study reveals the problems limiting the active use of digital resources in teaching cognitive modeling. Thirdly, the factors of effective use of gamification services for the purposes of enhancing cognitive activities are identified. Finally, an approach to planning cognitive modeling in the game educational environment is proposed.
Conclusions. The possibilities of effective using gamification digital resources to support cognitive development of individuals are summarized.

Keywords: 

Game educational environment; System thinking; Cognitive development; Activity approach; Intellect; Space of the game; Effectiveness of teaching

References: 
  1. Borisenko I. G., Yatsenko M. P., Chernykh S. I. Information policy in the education system as a reflection of the society problems. Philosophy of Education, 2016, vol. 1 (64), pp. 51–60. (In Russian). DOI: http://doi.org/10.15372/PHE20160105.
  2. Leontiev D., Lebedeva A., Kostenko V. Pathways of personality development: Following Lev Vygotsky’s guidelines. Educational Studies. 2017, no. 2, pp. 98–112. (In Russian). DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-2-98-112.
  3. Luchenkov А. V. Age-oriented high school model: Implementation outcomes. Educational Studies. 2016, no. 1, pp. 191–204.  (In Russian). DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-191-204
  4. Maloshonok N. How using the internet and multimedia technology in the learning process correlates with student engagement.  Educational Studies, 2016, no. 4, pp. 59–83.  (In Russian). DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2016-4-59-83
  5. Nenashov M. I., Okulov S. M., Yulov V. F. About children intellectual development in the process of studying informatics. Herald of Vyatka State University, 2012, no. 3-3, pp. 64–68. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18973414
  6. Polyakova V. A., Kozlov O. A. Impact gamification for information and educational environment of school. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2015, no. 5, pp. 513. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32664400
  7. Potaturov V. А. Informatization of education as a cultural issue. Man and Culture, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 1–40. (In Russian). DOI: http://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8744.2015.3.15247.
  8. Tyumeneva Y., Shkliaeva I. two approaches to the concept of knowledge application: Transfer and modeling overview and criticism. Educational Studies, 2016, no. 3, pp. 8–33. (In Russian). DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2016-3-8-33
  9. Ursul А. D., Ursul T. A. Education for sustainable development: The first results, problems and prospects. Sociodynamics, 2015, no. 1, pp. 11–74. (In Russian). DOI: http://doi.org/10.7256/2409-7144.2015.1.14001
  10. Aykac V. An application regarding the availability of mind maps in visual art education based on active learning method. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 174, pp. 1859–1866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.848
  11. Babintsev V. P., Sapryka V. А., Serkina Ya. I., Ushamirskaya G. F. Reform of higher education in Russia: Habitus conflict. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2016, vol. 17, issue 3, pp. 284–294. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.17.284
  12. Bodnar Ch., Clark R. Can Game-based learning enhance engineering communication skills? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 2017, vol. 60, is. 1, pp. 24–41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2632838
  13. Brull S., Finlayson S. Importance of gamification in increasing learning. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 2016, vol. 47 (8), pp. 372–375. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20160715-09
  14. Cakiroglu U., Basibuyuk B., Guler M., Atabay M., Memis B. Y. Gamifying an ICT course: Influences on engagement and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, vol. 69, pp. 98–107. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.018
  15. Chou C. An analysis of the 3D video and interactive response approach effects on the science remedial teaching for fourth grade underachieving students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2017, vol. 13 (4), pp. 1059–1073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00658a
  16. Cózar-Gutiérrez R., Sáez-López J. M. Game-based learning and gamification in initial teacher training in the social sciences: An experiment with MinecraftEdu. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2016, vol. 13, pp 2. DOI:  http://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0003-4
  17. Dichev Ch., Dicheva D. Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2017, vol. 14, pp. 9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
  18. Edwards A., Head M. Introducing a culture of modeling to enhance conceptual understanding in high school chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 2016, vol. 93 (8), pp. 1377–1382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00125
  19. Emerson T. L. N., English L. K., McGoldrick K. M. Cooperative learning and personality types. International Review of Economics Education, 2016, vol. 21, pp. 21–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.12.003
  20. Faiella F., Ricciardi M. Gamification and learning: a review of issues and research. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 2015, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 13–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1072
  21. Hamada M., Hassan M. An interactive learning environment for information and communication theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 2017, vol. 13, issue 1, pp. 35–59. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00603a
  22. Hasegawa H., Shibasaki S., Ito Y. Shape and layout understanding method using brain machine interface for idea creation support system. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, vol. 60, pp. 1205–1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.183
  23. Husen T., Tuijnman A.  The contribution of formal schooling to the increase in intellectual capital. Educational Researcher, 1991, no. 20 (7), pp. 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X020007017  
  24. Kelly P., Koates H., Naylor R. Leading Online education from participation to success. Educational Studies, 2016, no. 3, pp. 34–58. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2016-3-34-58
  25. Kholodnaya M. A. Intelligence, creativity, learning capability: resource approach (Development of V. N. Druzhinin’s ideas). Social Sciences, 2016, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 80–94.  DOI: http://doi.org/10.21557/SSC.46698030 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26277580
  26. Manz  E. Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 2012, vol. 96 (6), pp. 1071–1105. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21030
  27. Marti-Parreno J., Mendez-Ibanez E., Alonso-Arroyo A. The use of gamification in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2016, vol. 32, issue 6, pp. 663–676. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12161
  28. Mayer R. V. Сomputer model of the empirical knowledge of physics formation: Coordination with testing results. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2016, vol. 16, issue 2, pp. 239–247. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.16.239
  29.  McVey M. Changing spaces of education: New perspectives on the nature of learning. International Review of Education, 2013, vol. 59, issue 6, pp. 805–807. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9394-9
  30. Pennington B., McComas J. Effects of the good behavior game across classroom contexts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2017, vol. 50, issue 1, pp. 176–180. DOI:  http://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.357
  31. Scanlon E. Technology enhanced learning in science: Interactions, affordances and design based research. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2010, no. 2, pp. Art. 8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/2010-8
  32. Semenov A. Seymour papert and us. Constructionism as the educational philosophy of the 21st century.  Educational Studies, 2017, no. 1, pp. 269–294. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2017-1-269-294
  33. Sokolowski A., Yalvac B., Loving C. Science modelling in pre-calculus: How to make mathematics problems contextually meaningful. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2011, no. 42 (3), pp. 283–297. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.526255

Su C. The effects of students' learning anxiety and motivation on the learning achievement in the activity theory based gamified learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2017, no. 13 (5), pp. 1229–1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00669a

Date of the publication 31.10.2018