Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, No.4, pp.109-125
UDC: 
101 + 911.3 + 327.8

Cultural strategies and aspects of research the "One Belt One Road" initiative

Bernyukevich T. V. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Sun Yan 2 (Harbin, China, People's Republic of China), Golovko N. 3 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (NRU MGSU)
2 Heilongjiang International University
3 Novosibirsk State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The “One Belt One Road” Initiative is a global integration project, one of the most significant practical aspects of which is the problem of cross-border cooperation. The article is devoted to the identification of the specifics and interaction of global and regional development vectors and their role in strategies and trends of cross-border and regional cooperation within the Initiative framework. On the basis of the analysis of a number of works by Russian, European and Chinese authors, the article aims to summarize the existing ideas about local mechanisms and specific practices of cross-border cooperation, as well as the prospects for the strategic partnership between China and other countries within the Asian-European integration, to emphasize the significance of cultural and institutional differences between the engaged countries for the realization of the Initiative goals.
Materials and Methods. The article selectively analyzes the research papers of a number of Russian, European and Chinese authors devoted to geopolitical interests and practices of cross-border cooperation within the framework of the “One Belt One Road” Initiative. Consideration of the features of global and regional development vectors in diverse research literature makes it possible to focus attention on the issues of determining exactly the local mechanisms for realizing the practices of international cooperation.
Results. A comprehensive approach to analyzing not only the geopolitical goals of the “One Belt One Road” Initiative, but also their interfacing with local practices of cross-border cooperation, helps to determine the directions of transformation in the implementation of the Initiative at the regional level. The authors showed that the appropriate content of cross-border cooperation projects should not only take into account the heterogeneous significance of the “One Belt One Road” Initiative for different countries (primarily Central Asia, Russia, Europe and border regions), but also take into account the actual situation of local border conditions of interaction. For the full implementation of the “One Belt One Road” Initiative concrete steps are needed to create and support specific regional institutions for cooperation, to develop existing institutions of state cooperation of the countries that are part of the Initiative.
Conclusions. In most of the analyzed works by Russian, European and Chinese authors, the “One Belt One Road” Initiative is recognized as a project, which is linked to the prospects for stabilizing the political situation in the world, and the prospects of economic growth and economic integration. The geopolitical significance of the “One Belt One Road” Initiative is emphasized by a whole range of stated expectations (socio-political, socio-economic, institutional, strategic, cultural, etc.) related to its implementation, but the modernization of specific aspects of interaction between states, the development of cultural practices which meet the objectives of the initiative – all this remains at the level of a statement of intent. The importance of global economic integration is clear to everyone, but when it comes to specific projects, in particular in the field of cross-border cooperation, then good undertakings face a harsh reality – many countries are not ready for an equal participation in integration, either institutionally or culturally.

Keywords: 

One Belt One Road Initiative; regional cooperation; cross-border cooperation; interaction of cultures; China; Russia; Europe

References: 
  1. Titarenko M. L., Petrovsky V. Ye.  Russia and China as Mainstays of the New World Order. China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity, 2015, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 7–28. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/9785-0324-2015-00001 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25124662
  2. Makarov I. A., Sokolova A. K. Pairing Eurasian integration and the Economic belt of the Silk Road: opportunities for Russia. International Organisations Research Journal, 2016, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 40–57. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2016-02-40 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26236522
  3. Larin A. G. To the analysis of the essence of the ESPN project and its interface with the EAPS. China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity, 2016, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 138–149. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/9785-0324-2016-00025 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26704855
  4. Syroezhkin K. L. Conjugation of the EAEC and EPS. Russia and New States of Eurasia, 2016, no. 2, pp. 37–55. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26463829  
  5. Luzyanin S. G. "One belt, one way": Russian projection and connectivity problems. China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity, 2017, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 27–36. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/9785-0324-2017-00002 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30317642
  6. Morozov Yu. V. Russia, the West, and the SCO Countries in the Central Eurasia Energy Projects. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 2008, no. 5, pp. 78–93. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18853465  
  7. Mikhalev M. S. "One Belt, One Road" Project as a new foreign policy strategy of China. Short analysis of the discussion inside China. Contours of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2016, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 88–103. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29197956
  8. Lukin A. V. Chinese Global Project for Eurasia. Contours of global transformations: politics, economics, law, 2016, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 9–13. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29197945
  9. Samokhvalov V. The new Eurasia: post-Soviet space between Russia, Europe and China. European Politics and Society, 2016, vol. 17, issue Supplement 1, pp. 82–96. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1171285
  10. Aleksandrova M. V. Program of cooperation of the adjacent territories of Russia and China: history, facts, ways of implementation. China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity, 2010, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 198–222. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/9785-0324-2010-00015 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21616461
  11. Sanakoyev S. F. The economic belt of the Silk Road and the Russian Far East. Contours of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2016, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 17–18. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29197949  
  12. Šteinbuka I., Muravska T., Kuznieks A. Cooperation Formats of China and Europe: Synergies and Divergences. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 98–118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0007
  13. Kaplan Y. China’s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist project. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7–23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0002
  14. Dimitrijevič D. Chines Investments in Serbia – A Joint Pledge for the future of the new Silk Road. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 64–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0005
  15. Casarini N. When All Roads Lead to Beijing. Assessing China’s New Silk Road and its Implications for Europe. International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 2016, vol. 51, issue 4, pp. 95–108. DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.1224491
  16. Eom G. H. Silk roads again: Revisiting roads connecting Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2017, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 1–2. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2016.12.002
  17. Holslag J. How China’s New Silk Road Threatens European Trade. International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 2017, vol. 52, issue 1, pp. 46–60. DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2017.1261517
  18. Wilson J. L. The Eurasian Economic Union and China’s silk road: implications for the Russian–Chinese relationship. European Politics and Society, 2016, vol. 17, issue Supplement 1, pp. 113–132. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1171288
  19. Guo L., Zhou H., Xia Z., Huang F. Evolution, opportunity and challenges of transboundary water and energy problems in Central Asia. SpringerPlus, 2016, no. 5, pp. 1918. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3616-0
  20. Bernauer T., Siegfried T. Climate change and international water conflict in Central Asia. Journal of Peace Research, 2012, vol. 49, issue 1, pp. 227–239. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343311425843
  21. Morozova V. S. Regional Cultures Potential of Zabaikalsky Krai (Russia) and Dongbei (China) as a Resource for Border Areas Co-development. Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Sociology, Social Work, 2013, no. 4, pp. 135–141. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20279488 
  22. Han L. Prospect of the Correlation of the Strategy "One Belt - One Road" and the Eurasian Economic Union. Administrative Consulting, 2015, no. 11, pp. 66–70. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25099312
  23. Peyrous S. Discussing China: Sinophilia and Sinophobia in Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2016, vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 14–23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.10.003
  24. Zhukov A. V., Zhukova A. A. Projections and Receptions of Chinese Images on Everyday Consciousness of the Russian Population in the Baikal Region from XVII till XX Centuries. Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University. Series Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Sociology, Social Work, 2014, no. 4, pp. 130–138. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22079020
  25. Keven V., Bernyukevich T. Factors, Stages of Formation and Development of Russian Culture in Kharbin. Transbaikal State University Journal, 2013, no. 5, pp. 105–109. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21573504
  26. Contessi N. P. Central Asia in Asia: Charting growing trans-regional linkages. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2016, vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 3–13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.11.001
  27. Malle S. Russia and China in the 21st century. Moving towards cooperative behavior. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2017, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 136–150. DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.02.003  
Date of the publication 31.08.2018