Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, No.4, pp.126-139
UDC: 
903.5(315):7.03(357)

Experience of Cultural interchange along the Silk Road in the mirror of historiography

Komissarov S. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Tang Chung 2 (Hong Kong, People's Republic of China), Soloviev A. I. 3 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Kudinova M. A. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 National Research Novosibirsk State University
2 Chinese University of Hong Kong
3 Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract: 

Introduction. The Great Silk Road through the centuries (at least from the 2nd century BC) was one of the «world axes». Eurasian civilizations have been developing along this axis. The term itself is quite late, but it describes the processes of trade and cultural exchange, that were reconstructed according to archaeological and other data. In recent twenty years sensational discoveries have been made in China: excavations of the tombs of so called Sogdians attracted attention of scientists all over the world. Hundreds of books and papers in top-rated journals have been published, all these materials need summarizing. Besides, the Silk Road as a scientific problem was considered, firstly, as a successful historical experience of the real multiculturalism, which is in crisis now all over the world. Secondly, the “One Belt, One Road” initiative, which was proposed in 2012 by the Chinese leader, became a basis of the strategy of modern China, and promoted the studies of all the aspects of the problem (including the historical background). The aim of the work is a historiographical review of the publications devoted to the research of archaeological objects related to the Silk Road.
Materials and Methods. The methodology and methods of the research were borrowed from the historiography (as a special historical discipline) and adapted to the stated objective. Primary focus is on the external (not internal) factors of the development of the historiography.
Results. Numerous publications in peer-reviewed journals dedicated to the “One Belt, One Road” initiative were analyzed. The direct relation between political concepts and their projection to the research area was revealed. Civilization dimension of the concept of the New Silk Road needs relying on the study of the historical experience, including the one materialized in cultural relics. As for the archaeological materials, methods of interdisciplinary research assume the great importance.
Conclusions. Due to the historiographical review the main study materials and the level of their interpretations were identified, that makes it possible to map out the further investigations. The religious and mythological relief panels from “Sogdian»” (and similar to them) tombs have a great heuristic potential for the study of cross-cultural communications and the importance of ideological tolerance for the development of the ethos and state. This subject will be described in more details in the upcoming monograph.

Keywords: 

Great Silk Road; Tang dynasty; «Sogdian» tombs; Multiculturalism; Historical experience

References: 
  1. Rose J. The Sogdians: prime movers between boundaries. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and Middle East, 2010, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 410–419. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/1089201X-2010-024
  2. Wertmann P., Wagner M., Tarasov P. Sogdian careers and families in sixth- to seventh-century northern China: a case study of the Shi family based on archaeological finds and epitaph inscriptions. History of the Family, 2017, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 103–135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2016.1243484
  3. HAN Jia-bing. The Discrimination of the Plural Culture, Cultural Pluralism and Multiculturalism. Historical Review, 2006, no. 5, pp. 185–188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-1873.2006.05.020 (In Chinese).
  4. Chun A. The coming crisis of multiculturalism in «transnational» Taiwan. Social Analysis, 2002, vol. 46, issue 2, pp. 102–122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/015597702782384165
  5. Lingley K. A. Silk Road Dress in a Chinese Tomb: Xu Xianxiu and Sixth-Century Cosmopolitanism. The Silk Road, 2014, vol. 12, pp. 1–12. http://www.silk-road.com/newsletter/vol12/Lingley_SR12_2014_pp1_12+PlateI.pdf
  6. Hansen V. The Silk Road: A new history. New York, Oxford University Press Publ., 2015, 320 p. https://books.google.ru/books?id=FDdRDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA300&lpg=PA300&dq=sogdian%27s+tombs+religion+tolerance&source=bl&ots=6Afatn3cHW&sig=1E91WKegGp9AbZczRbKEs9TiGZk&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjz9vG0hK_VAhXHQJoKHQC2CugQ6AEIMjAB#v=onepage&q=sogdian's%20tombs%20religion%20tolerance&f=false
  7. Grenet F. Religious diversity among Sogdian merchants in sixth-century China: Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Manichaeism, and Hinduism. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and Middle East, 2007, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 463–478. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-2007-017
  8. Contessi N. The New Silk Road diplomacy: China’s Central Asian foreign policy since the Cold War. Central Asian Survey, 2012, vol. 31, issue 1, pp. 99–100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2011.603248
  9. Fallon Th. The New Silk Road: Xi Jinping’s grand strategy for Eurasia. American Foreign Policy Interests: Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy, 2015, vol. 37, issue 3, pp. 140–147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803920.2015.1056682
  10. Ferdinand P. Westward ho – the China dream and “One Belt, One Road»: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs, 2016, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 941–957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12660
  11. Wang Y. Offensive for defensive: The Belt and Road initiative and China’s new grand strategy. Pacific Review, 2016, vol. 29, issue 3, pp. 455–463. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1154690
  12. Zhang X. Chinese capitalism and the Maritime Silk Road: A world-systems perspectives. Geopolitics, 2017, vol. 22, issue 2, pp. 310–331. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1289371
  13. Blanchard J-M. F., Flint C. The geopolitics of China’s maritime Silk Road initiative. Geopolitics, 2017, vol. 22, issue 2, pp. 223–245. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1291503
  14. Summers T. China’s “New Silk Roads”: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy. Third World Quarterly, 2016, vol. 37, issue 9, pp. 1628–1643. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415
  15. Mackerras C. Xinjiang in China's foreign relations: Part of a New Silk Road or Central Asian zone of conflict. East Asia, 2015, vol. 32, issue 1, pp. 25–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9224-8.
  16. Wang Y. Internal Civilizational Content – Civilizational. Contracts of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2016, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 76–87. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29197955
  17. Syroezhkin K. L. Silk Road Economic Belt Project in the complex space of the Central Asia Region. Contracts of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2016, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 104–122. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29197957
  18. Sanakoev S. F. Silk Road Economic Belt and Russian Far East. Contracts of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2016, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 17–18. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29197949
  19. Christian D. Silk Roads or Steppe Roads? The Silk Roads in World History. Journal of World History, 2000, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2000.0004
  20.  Canepa M. P. Distant displays of power: Understanding cross-cultural interaction among the elites of Rome, Sasanian Iran, and Sui–Tang China. Ars Orientalis, 2010, vol. 38, pp. 121–154. https://www.academia.edu/338178/_Distant_Displays_of_Power_Understanding_Cross-Cultural_Interaction_Among_the_Elites_of_Rome_Sasanian_Iran_and_Sui_Tang_China._
  21. Zhang Y., Elsner W. A social-leverage mechanism of the Silk Road: the private emergence of institutions in Central Asia, from the 7th to the 9th century. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2017, vol. 13, issue 2, pp. 379–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000291
  22.  Rezakhani Kh. The Road that never was: the Silk Road and trans-Eurasian exchange. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and Middle East, 2010, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 420–433. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/1089201X-2010-025
  23.  Liu S., Li Q. H., Gan F., Zhang P., Lankton J. W. Silk Road glass in Xinjiang, China: chemical compositional analysis and interpretation using a high-resolution portable XRF spectrometer. Journal of Archaeological Sciences, 2012, vol. 39, issue 7, pp. 2128–2142. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.035
  24.  Wang S., Zhao X. Re-evaluating the Silk Road’s Qinghai Route using dendrochronology. Dendrochronologia, 2013, vol. 31, issue 1, pp. 34–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2012.05.001
  25.  Xie C. Z., Li C. X., Cui Y. Q., Zhang Q. C., Fu Y. Q., Zhu H., Zhou H. Evidence of ancient DNA reveals the first European lineage in Iron Age Central China. Proceedings of Royal Society. B: Biological Science, 2007, vol. 274, no. 1618, pp. 1597–1602. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0219
Date of the publication 31.08.2018