Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2018, No.1, pp.107-123
UDC: 
138.2

The concept of tradition in contemporary western academic discourse

Illarionov G. A. 1 (Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)
1 Siberian Federal University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to solving the problem of definition of concept of tradition. The problem is caused by pluralism and relativism in using this concept. Different approaches to tradition serves as a source of social conflict. The research goal is to summarize conceptual foundations of the notion of tradition through a consideration of the antinomies of its attributes and functions through the analysis of the use of the concept in the Western literature.
Materials and Methods. The study is based on methods of conceptual and structural analysis, revealing the concept through exploration of its elements, emphasizing the main structural relations and the opposition in it. The material for the analysis includes the works of the following foreign researchers of the tradition, published in the English language: C. Badik, A. Giddens and S. Bronner, M. Bevir, Y. Yadgar, M. Beckstein, G. Kegler, etc.
Results. As the result of the research, the author has summarized the main forms of using the concept of tradition in English academic literature. An approach to tradition based on the complementarity of two understandings of the concept is proposed. Tradition can be considered as objective, immutable core of culture, transmitted through the generations. At the same time, tradition may be seen as a semiotic construct, generated in real time by people based on their perception of the past. The overall picture of tradition appears in the form of a modular system, consisting of subconcepts.
Conclusions. The construction of the generalized unified theory of social inheritance, consistent with the conceptualizing of tradition, implies the overcoming of the antinomies of its attributes and functions. The way to overcome the problem lies in the use of methodology based on the principle of complementarity. The reasons for preventing the spread of such approach are socio-cultural bases of studying the concept of tradition.

Keywords: 

Tradition; Concept of tradition; Attributes of tradition; Function of tradition; Objectivism; Constructivism; Posttraditional society

References: 

 

  1. Beckstein М. The concept of a living tradition. European Journal of Social Theory, 2017, vol. 20, issue 4, pp.  491–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016668185
  2. Bevir M. On tradition. Humanitas, 2000, vol. 13, issue 2, pp. 28–53. URL:https://search.proquest.com/openview/bb69d22b182ac3bca791279f45da3cc2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=30185
  3. Birner J. Popper and Hayek on Reason and Tradition. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2014, vol. 44, issue 3, pp. 263–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393112452793
  4. Bronner S. J. Explaining Traditions: Folk Behavior in Modern Culture. Lexington, University Press of Kentucky Publ., 2011, 546 p. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jcn8m
  5. Budick S. The Western Theory of Tradition: Terms and Paradigms of the Cultural Sublime. Yale University Press Publ., 2000, 293 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-3726
  6. Devine P. The Concept of Tradition: A Problem Out of MacIntyre. Reason Papers, 2013, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 107–123. URL: https://reasonpapers.com/pdf/351/rp_351.pdf
  7. Foster J. G., Rzhetsky A., Evans J. A. Tradition and Innovation in Scientists Research Strategies. American Sociological Review, 2015, vol. 80, issue 5, pp. 875–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415601618
  8. Faucheux C. Giddens, Anthony. 1994. Beyond Left and Right – The Future of Radical Politics. Concepts and Transformation, 1997, vol. 2, issue 1, pp. 107–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.2.1.08fau
  9. Glassie H. Tradition. Journal of American Folklore, 1995, vol. 108, no. 430, pp. 395–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/541653
  10. Hoppera L. M., Spiteria A., Lambethb S. P., Schapirob S. J., Hornera V., Whiten  A. Experimental studies of traditions and underlying transmission processes in chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 2007, vol. 73, issue 6, pp. 1021–1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.016
  11. Hobsbawm E., Ranger T. (eds) The Invention of Tradition. New-York, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1983, 323 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=sfvnNdVY3KIC&printsec= frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false
  12. Jacobs S., Tregenza I. Rationalism and tradition: The Popper–Oakeshott conversation. European Journal of Political Theory, 2014, vol. 13, issue 1, pp. 3–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885112471274
  13. Kögler H.-H. Dialogue and Community: The Ethical Claim of Tradition.  Journal of the Philosophy of History, 2014, vol. 8, issue 3, pp. 380–406. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341281
  14. Ladwig B. Against Wild Animal Sovereignty: An Interest-based Critique of Zoopolis. Journal of Political Philosophy, 2015, vol. 23, issue 3, pp. 282–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12068
  15. Lazarus N. Nationalism and Cultural Practice in the Postcolonial World. Cambridge University Press Publ., 2009, 295 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585678
  16. Negus K., Pickring M. Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value. Chapter 5: Tradition London, SAGE Publ., 2012, 192 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446220740
  17. Nikiforova N. The Concept of Technology and the Russian Cultural Research Tradition. Technology and Culture, 2015, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 184–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2015.0009
  18. O’Collins G., Braithwaite D. Tradition as Collective Memory: A Theological Task to be Tackled. Theological Studies, 2015, vol. 76, issue 1, pp. 29–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0040563914565300
  19. Petruzzelli A. M., Albino V. A tradition-based innovation strategy. When Tradition Turns Into Innovation: How Firms Can Create and Appropriate Value Through Tradition. Sawston, Woodhead Publ., 2012, pp. 33–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-664-7.50009-4
  20. Pieper J. About the concept of tradition. Wiesbaden, Springer Publ., 1958, 64 p. (In German) DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04297-6 
  21. Ruben D.-H. Traditions and True Successors. Social Epistemology, 2013, vol. 27, issue 1, pp. 32–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2012.760661
  22. Smith A. P. Against Tradition to liberate tradition: weaponized apophaticism and gnostic refusal. Angelaki, 2014, vol. 19, issue 2, pp. 145–159. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2014.950870
  23. Wall S. Political Morality and the Authority of Tradition. Journal of Political Philosophy, 2016, vol. 24, issue 2, pp. 137–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12058 
  24. White S. K. Maintaining and enriching a tradition. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2017, vol. 43, issue 3, pp. 280–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453716666634
  25. Yadgar Y. Tradition. Human Studies, 2013, vol. 36, issue 4, pp. 451–470. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9294-9

 

Date of the publication 28.02.2018