Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, No.6, pp.134-151
UDC: 
17:37.012.01

To understand pedagogical reflection of teachers: Justification of human model

Kozhevnikova M. N. 1 (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation)
1 Institute of Education Management of the Russian Academy of Education
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of understanding, use, and teaching pedagogical reflection. The purpose of the article is to provide philosophical grounding of pedagogical reflection and to develop its mythological humanitarian model.
Materials and Methods. The research was carried out within the framework of philosophy of education methodology, using epistemological analysis, phenomenological approaches and socio-philosophical criticism. When developing a humanitarian model of reflection, the methodology of participant observation was applied.
Results. The author analyzed the existing interpretations and practices of pedagogical reflection, including the foreign theories of D.Shon, Zeichner, Liston, etc., the reflective teaching movement and the "research-in-action" movement, and Russian theory and practice of Methodological school, a psychological concept and methodology of Bizayeva, a reflexive-oriented model of teacher education of Stetsenko, etc.
Distinguishing the types of reflection, the author singled out humanitarian reflection. Philosophical analysis of the nature of reflection led to the problem of professional teacher’ self-consciousness. The meaning of humanitarian reflection as a way to "the authenticity of the teacher" revealed the need for the teacher's reflective position.
As it was understood from different educational works, 'reflexion' could be interpreted as events different by their nature. Different types of pedagogical reflection were identified, from which the humanitarian one was singled out and justified. It could be utilized in different scales of use, with different levels of theoretical conceptualization and with different outcomes.
A special methodology was worked out to master humanitarian reflection in the continuing teacher education (continuing professional development) according to the author's model ‘Creative Autonomous Reflexive Teacher’, in the professional learning community.
It was acknowledged that the epistemology of pedagogical reflection revealed the problem of relations between the reflection and action.
Conclusions. As it was clarified, the humanitarian reflection which is different from the organizational and logical-methodological (or technical) ones, is the important path to the "authenticity of the teacher", which justifies the need for a reflective position of a teacher. Due to its capacities of 'condensation' and 'crystallization' of 'personal human meanings' in one’s being a teacher, in the nearest future in the face of challenges of artificial intelligence coming into education the relevance of this type of reflection can only increase.

Keywords: 

Humanitarian reflection; Philosophy of education; Teacher's authenticity; Inexpressible practical knowledge; Hermeneutic practice

References: 
  1. Bizyaeva A. A. The Psychology of Thinking Teachers: Pedagogical Reflection. Pskov, Pskov State Pedagogical University Publ., 2004, 216 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20080081
  2. Kozhevnikova M. N. Student’s subjectiveness and teacher’s autonomy: educational-and-philosophical analysis. Man and Education, 2015, no. 1, pp. 63–67. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23466331
  3. Kozhevnikova M. N. Creative self-reflexive teacher: model of teacher training. Man and Education, 2016, no. 1, pp. 115–121. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26606418
  4. Stetsenko I. A. Formation of Pedagogical Reflection in the System of Higher Pedagogical Education. Innovative Projects and Programs in Education, 2014, vol. 4, pp. 37–40. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21992922
  5. Argyris C., Schön D. A. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis, 1997, no. 77/78, pp. 345–348. Google Scholar
  6. Argyris C., Schön D. A. Organisational Learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley Publ., 1996. Google Scholar
  7. Beck C., Kosnik C. Reflection-in-Action: In Defence of Thoughtful Teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 2001, vol. 31, issue 2, pp. 217–227. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00193
  8. Belvis E., Pineda P., Armengol C., Moreno V. Evaluation of reflective practice in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 2013, vol. 36, issue 3, pp. 279–292. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.718758 
  9. Berci M. E. The Staircase of teacher development: a perspective on the process and consequences of the unity and integration of self. Teacher Development, 2006, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 55–71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13664530600587113
  10. Finefter-Rosenbluh I. Behind the scenes of reflective practice in professional development: A glance into the ethical predicaments of secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016, vol. 60, pp. 1–11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.028
  11. Higgins Ch. The good life of teaching: an ethics of professional practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2010, vol. 44, issue 2-3, pp. 189–478. URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jope.2010.44.issue-2-3/issuetoc
  12. Jay J. K., Johnson K. L. Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2002, vol. 18, issue 1, pp. 73–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8
  13. Jurow S. A. Cultivating Self in the context of transformative professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 2009, vol. 60, issue 3, pp. 277–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109336895
  14. Mann S. J., Walsh S. RP or 'RIP': a critical perspective on reflective practice. Applied Linguistics Review, 2013, vol. 4 (2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0013
  15. McMillan J. H., Schumacher S. Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Pearson Higher Ed, 2014. Google Scholar
  16. Oakley G., Pegrum M., Johnston Sh. Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 2014, vol. 42, issue 1, pp. 36–50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.854860
  17. Palmer P. J. The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. John Wiley & Sons Publ., 2017. Google Scholar
  18. Schon D. A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic books Publ., 1984, Vol. 5126. Google Scholar
  19. Schon D.: Teaching artistry through reflection-in-action. New Thinking in Organizational Behaviour. Ed. Tsoukas H. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann Publ., 1994, pp. 235–249. Google Scholar
  20. Sellars M. Reflective Practice for Teachers. London, SAGE Publ., 2017. Google Scholar
  21. Sellars M. Teachers and change: The role of reflective practice. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 55, pp. 461–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.525 
  22. Selmo L., Orsenigo J. Learning and Sharing through Reflective Practice in Teacher Education in Italy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 116, pp. 1925–1929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.496
  23. Weimer M. Authenticity in Teaching. The Teaching Professor, 2011, October 2, issue. URL: http://www.montana.edu/teachlearn/documents/AuthenticityinTeaching_article.pdf
  24. Werbińska D. From trainee to teacher. Reflective practice for novice teachers. System, 2016, vol. 60, pp. 137–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.004
  25. Zeichner K., Liston D. Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 1987, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 23–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j18v7162275t1w3w
Date of the publication 30.12.2017