Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 52–71
© Tsepkova A. V., 2017
UDC: 
372.016 + 8111.111

Principles of analyzing literary texts as foreign language teaching materials

Tsepkova A. V. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4379
Abstract: 

Introduction. The paper concerns the problem of supervising integrated bachelor theses, based on literary texts as materials for teaching a foreign language. The aim of the paper is to frame the principles of conducting integrated graduate research work which is to display professional and subject-specific competencies, acquired by graduate students during the course of study.
Materials and Methods. The research is based on the following methods: observation; analysis and synthesis, employed to correlate literary, linguistic and teaching approaches to works of fiction and to systematize personal professional experience of teaching English and literature and supervising graduation theses on these topics; and modeling, aimed at building the algorithm of integrated graduate research work.
Results. The paper describes the algorithm of testing an authentic fictional text in order to determine its educational potential in teaching a foreign language. The educational potential of a text is revealed by means of analyzing specific text features on extralinguistic, content, structural and language levels and matching these features with reading exercises, activities and tasks they predetermine.
Conclusions. The proposed research work algorithm, based on a complex approach to a fictional text as a source of linguistic, literary, socio-cultural, and historical information, can be effectively used to design teaching materials and to enhance the competencies acquired by bachelor students, majoring in teaching a foreign language.

Keywords: 

Graduation thesis; Bachelor’s degree; Pedagogy; Foreign language teaching; Literary text; Lexico-grammatical analysis; Literary analysis; Literary competence; Language competence; Teacher competence

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Principles of analyzing literary texts as foreign language teaching materials

For citation:
Tsepkova A. V. Principles of analyzing literary texts as foreign language teaching materials . Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 52–71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1704.04
References: 
  1. Alameddinea M. M., Ahwal H. W. Inquiry based teaching in literature classrooms. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 232, pp. 332–337. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.031
  2. Bobkina J., Dominguez E. The use of literature and literary texts in the EFL classroom; Between Consensus and Controversy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2014, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 248–260. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.248
  3. Ceylan N. O. Using short stories in reading skills class. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 232, pp. 311–315. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.027
  4. Chalikendy M. A. Literature: A natural source for teaching English in ESL/ EFL classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2015, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 224–234. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.6p.224
  5. Fahim M., Khatib S. The effect of applying critical thinking techniques on students’ attitudes towards literature. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2013, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 80–84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.80
  6. Fogal G. G. Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research. Language and Literature, 2015, vol. 24, issue 1, pp. 54–72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963947014555450
  7. Giovanelli M. Construing the child reader: A cognitive stylistic analysis of the opening to Neil Gaiman’s The Graveyard Book. Children’s Literature in Education, 2016, pp. 1–16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10583-016-9285-3
  8. Vassiliki G., Marita P., Eleni A. The efficacy of teaching differentiation on children with Special Educational Needs (SEN) through Literature. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, vol. 29, pp. 67–74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.207
  9. Gomes S. L. A. Culture and society in the teaching of the mother tongue and literature. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 178, pp. 123–127. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.167
  10. Johnson K. E., Dellagnelo A. K. How ‘sign meaning develops’: Strategic mediation in learning to teach. Language Teaching Research, 2013, vol. 17, issue 4, pp. 409–432. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168813494126
  11. Khatib M., Askari H. A Study of the effects of teaching literature on improving students’ second language attitudes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2012, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 37–45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v .1n.4p.37
  12. Liang Zh. Ambiguity and final choice: Reader’ s response in a streetcar named desire. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 221–225. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.1.221-225
  13. McDonald M., Kazemi E., Kavanagh S. S. Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 2013, vol. 64, issue 5, pp. 378–386. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
  14. Mei-Yun K. A case study of an EFL teacher’s critical literacy teaching in a reading class in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 2013, vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 91–108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457537
  15. Mohammadzadeh B. Incorporating multicultural literature in English language teaching curriculum. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2009, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 23–27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.008
  16. Nasirahmadi A., Madarsara F. A., Aghdam H. R. Cultural issues and teaching literature for language learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 98, pp. 1325–1330. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.549
  17. Qiang Wang, Hong Zhang. Promoting teacher autonomy through university–school collaborative action research. Language Teaching Research, 2014, vol. 18, issue 2, pp. 222–241. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505942
  18. Rassaei E. Effects of three forms of reading-based output activity on L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 2015, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 76–95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168815606160
  19. Safaeia L. A., Bulca M. Extensive reading and creative practices. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 70, pp. 592–597. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.097
  20. Shokrolahi M. The Effect of literary vs. non-literary texts through critical reading approach on the reading comprehension development of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 215–220. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.1.215-220
  21. Songören S.A. The place of children’s literature texts in teaching German as a foreign / second foreign language. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 70, pp. 1825–1830. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.259
  22. Spirovska Tevdovska E. Literature in ELT setting: students’ attitudes and preferences towards literary texts. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 232, pp. 161–169. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.041
  23. Vala J., Sladová J., Řeřichová V., Fic I. The changes in the attitudes towards poetry in the class (14–15 years old) thanks to experimental teaching methods. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 116, pp. 3811–3815. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.846
  24. Vk P., Savaedi S. Y. Teaching poetry in autonomous ELT classes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 98, pp. 1919–1925. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.623
  25. Yavuz A. Teaching and interpreting literary texts: Difficulties of 4th year ELT students at a Turkish university. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, vol. 158, pp. 27–32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.028
  26. Zorba M. G. Prospective English language teachers’ views on literature- oriented courses at Akdeniz University's ELT department. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, vol. 70, pp. 1911–1918. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.269
Date of the publication 31.08.2017