Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, No.6, pp.71-86
UDC: 
159.95 + 004.738.5

The influence of modern web technologies on the development of a new kind of thinking

Sizikova T. E. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Stunzha N. A. 2 (Moscow, Russian Federation), Poveshenko A. F. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Agavelyan R. O. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation), Voloshina T. V. 1 (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
1 Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
2 National Research Institute of Higher School of Economics
Abstract: 

Introduction. This article explores the impact of Web 3.0 and Web 4.0 contents dominant in the information environment on modern thinking. The purpose of the article is an analytical study of the changes that occur in the thinking of Internet consumers.
Materials and Methods. The research is conducted on the basis of the method of theoretical analysis by adopting an activity and synergistic approaches.
Results. The authors have identified the following main characteristics of Web 3.0 and Web 4.0 content: semantic structure, cooperativity, clustering, wide opportunities for consumer self-expression, self-developing basic personal content, self-correcting errors system, efficient and convenient information management, accessibility, simplicity and maximum convenience, development and use of additional features, human resource management in the current time mode, crystallization , and the availability of maximum possible security of consumers. The authors emphasize that in the present context of accelerating scientific and technological progress and the development of global information networks, qualitative changes in the thinking activity of the modern person are taking place. Content has a developing effect on consumers’ thinking and thinking itself becomes like content. The authors suggest the hypothesis that there exist a combination of two mechanisms of self-development of content thinking: the external mechanism – the self-development of content, and the internal mechanism – the reflection.
Conclusions. Conclusions are drawn that the main characteristics of such thinking are the following: accumulation of many different types and styles of thinking, the leading method is synthetic deduction, increasing entropy, increasing singularity, operation within the framework of the "peace" category, expanding and tapering integrity, variability and different levels of clusters of processing and packaging of information, bringing thought to the ultimate limits of philosophical categories, multi-vector focus of reality research, and creative self-development. The limitation of content thinking is a reduction of a reflection level as a consequence of a scanning method of working with information.

Keywords: 

Content thinking; Synthetic deduction; Reflection; Singularity of thinking; Entropy of thinking; Multidimensionality of thinking; Integrity of thinking; Nonlinear movement of thought

References: 
  1. Asmolov A. G., Asmolov G. A. From We-media to I-media: Transformation of identity in the virtual world. Voprosy Psychologii, 2009, no. 3, pp. 3–15. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15583560
  2. Arkhipov G. I. The corporate and territorial organization of the mining industry and cluster projects in the territory with economy of mineral raw materials. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2014, no. 8, pp. 16–29. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21155559
  3. Velichkovsky B. M., Nuzhdin Y. O., Svirina E. P., Stroganova T. A., Fedorov A. A., Shishkin S. L. Management of the "power of thought": on the way to new forms of human interaction with technical devices. Voprosy Psychologii, 2016, no. 1, pp. 109–122. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25925236
  4. Vesnin A. A. Problems of teaching in the context of culture of information abstraction. Bulletin of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology, 2016, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 14–16. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27033435  
  5. Voloshina T. V., Sizikova T. E., Stunzha N. A. Content Thinking – New Competence of Modern Education. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2016, no. 4, pp. 7–14. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26687288
  6. Voloshina T. V., Ignatenko O. E. The use of technology moderation of the learning process in the training of future teachers of special education. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2012, no. 2, pp. 58-60. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25417449
  7. Dubov I. G., Mitina O. V. The Role of Activity and Intellect In Achieving Success. Voprosy Psychologii, 2016, no. 2, pp. 54–69. (In Russian) URL:  https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26505365  
  8. Ivannikov V. A. Activity nature of the personality. Voprosy Psychologii, 2015, no. 6, pp. 3–8. (In Russian) URL:  https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25596112  
  9. Korovkin S. Yu., Savinov A. D., Vladimirov I. Y. monitoring of the dynamics of loading of working memory at the stage of ecobali insidenova solutions. Voprosy Psychologii, 2016, no. 2, pp. 148–161. (In Russian) URL:  https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26505374
  10. Lazhintseva E. M., Bochver A. A. Internet as a new medium for the manifestation of deviant behavior of teenagers. Voprosy Psychologii, 2015, no. 4, pp. 49–58. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25596093
  11. Mdivani M. O. Digital learning environment at school: views of participants of educational process. Voprosy Psychologii, 2016, no. 1, pp. 68–78. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25925232
  12. Rubtsova M. O. Technology of problem-based learning. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2012, no. 2, pp. 94–98. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25417454
  13. Soldatova G. U., Rasskazova E. I. The Model the transfer of experience between generations in the development and use of the Internet. Voprosy Psychologii, 2015, no. 2, pp. 56–67. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25470006
  14. Zuckerman A. Learning leads development. Where?. Educational Studies Moscow, 2010, no. 1, pp. 42–90. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13920087
  15. Zuckerman A., Mitina O. V. Diagnostics of critical thinking. Voprosy Psychologii, 2015, no. 3, pp. 15–30. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25510936  
  16. Cherepanova N. The Use of web2 in the educational process teacher psychologist. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2012, no. 1, pp. 105-111. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25475459
  17. Abdelraheem A. Y. Computerized leaning environments: Problems, design, challendes and future promises. Journal of Interactive Online Leaning, 2003, vol. 2 (2), pp. 1–9. URL:  http://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v2/n2/computerized-learning-environments-problems-design-challenges-and-future-promises
  18. Agras W. S., Jacob R. G., Lebedeck M. The California drought: A quasiexperimental analysis of social policy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1980, vol. 13, issue 4, pp. 561–570. DOI https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1980.13-561   
  19. Andersson G., Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2009, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 196–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070903318960  
  20. Anohah E., Oyelere S. S., Suhonen J., Sutinen E. Trends of mobile learning in computing education from 2006 to 2014: A systematic review of research publications. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 2017, vol. 9 (1), pp. 16–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2017010102  
  21. Bennett S., Maton K., Kervin L. The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2008, vol. 39 (5), pp. 775–786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x 
  22. Cover R. Identity, Internet, and Globalization. Digital Identities. Creating and Communicating the Online Self. Elsevier Publ., 2016, pp. 141–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420083-8.00005-5  
  23. Duffy A. Guiding students through reflective practice – The preceptors experiences. A qualitative descriptive study. Nurse Education in Practice, 2009, vol. 9, issue 3, pp. 166–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2008.07.002
  24. Koutropoulas A. Digital natives: Ten years after. Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 2011, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 525–538. URL: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no4/koutropoulos_1211.pdf
  25. Levett‐Jones T. L. Facilitating reflective practice and self‐assessment of competence through the use of narratives. Nurse Education in Practice, 2007, vol. 7, issue 2, pp. 112–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2006.10.002  
  26. Livingstone S., Helsper E. J. Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2008, vol. 52, issue 4, pp. 581–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396  
  27. Mann K., Gordon J., MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Theory and Practice, 2009, no. 14, pp. 595–621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2  
  28. Moallem M. Applying consrtructivist and objectivivist leaning theories in the design of a web-based course: Implication for practice. Educational Technology & Society, 2001, vol. 4 (3), pp. 113–125. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ635423  
  29. Richards D., Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 2012, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 329–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004
  30. Suhonen J., Sutinen E. FODEM: developing digital leaning environments in widely dispersed leaning communities. Educational Technology & Society, 2006, vol. 9 (3), pp. 43–55. URL: http://www.ifets.info/journals/9_3/5.pdf   
  31. Xiao Wang, Lingxi Li, Yong Yuan, Peijun Ye, Fei-Yue Wang. ACP-based social computing and parallel intelligence: Societies 5.0 and beyond. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 2016, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 377–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trit.2016.11.005  
  32. Issa T., Isaias P. Internet factors influencing generations Y and Z in Australia and Portugal: A practical study. Information Processing & Management, 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 592–617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.12.006
Date of the publication 30.12.2017