Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, No.6, pp.263-280
UDC: 
81'23 / 81'373.421

Synonymic relations in language and utterance

Belov V. A. 1 (Cherepovets, Russian Federation)
1 Cherepovets State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article considers the problem of distinguishing between language and context synonyms. It is widely agreed in structural linguistic tradition that language synonyms are the words with the identical or similar meanings. They are presented in the dictionaries of synonyms. Context synonyms are lexical items which have similar meanings only in an utterance; but they are not presented as synonyms in dictionaries. The purpose of the research is to identify , how synonymic relations are formed in discourse. The hypothesis is that context synonyms occur in utterances in similar situations.
Materials and Methods. The data used for this study come from (1) Russian dictionaries of synonyms; (2) the psycholinguistic experiment; (3) Russian National Corpora. Firstly, using the dictionaries of synonyms the author chose language synonyms. Secondly, the experiment enabled the author to identify context synonyms. In the experiment 116 subjects were recruited for this study; they were supposed to provide synonyms for suggested words. Finally, the author analyzed the meanings of language and context synonyms in corpora utterances. Information concerning frequency was also employed in the study. To illustrate the methodology, the author analyzed the synonymic set with the headword ‘ошибка’ (error).
Results. The research has shown that language and context synonyms have the same features in the context. They may specify and complement the denotative situation expressed by the headword. The headword of the synonymic group usually presents the generalized situation.
Conclusions. The method proposed by the author shows that synonyms are the words which may express the same slots (components) of a denotative situation. Synonym meanings operate only in utterance context. Therefore, the distinction of language and context synonyms was not proved.

Keywords: 

Lexical semantics; Synonymy; Synonymic group; Synonymic set; Corpus research; Context-depend synonyms; Situational synonyms; Dictionaries of synonyms; Referential situation

References: 
  1. Chomsky N. The language capacity: architecture and evolution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017, vol. 24 (1), pp. 200–203. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1078-6
  2. Freidin R. Chomsky's linguistics. Language, 2016, vol. 92 (3), pp. 671–723 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0057
  3. Oliveira H., Gomes P. Revisiting the ontologising of semantic relation arguments in wordnet synsets. Natural Language Engineering, 2016, vol. 22 (6), pp. 819–848. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1351324915000212
  4. Fellbaum C. Large-scale Lexicography in the Digital Age. International Journal of Lexicography, 2014, vol. 27 (4), pp. 378–395. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecu018
  5. Sheinman V., Fellbaum C., Julien I.  Large, huge or gigantic? Identifying and encoding intensity relations among adjectives in WordNet. Language Resources and Evaluation, 2013, vol. 47 (3), pp.  797–816. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10579-012-9212-1
  6. Zapico M., Vivas J. Synonymy from a linguistic-cognitive perspective. Measuring semantic distance. Onomazein, 2015, vol. 32, pp. 198–211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.32.11
  7. Zakharov V. P. Prolegomena to corpus linguistics. Issues of Psycholinguistics, 2016, no. 2, pp. 150–161. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26283006 
  8. Boriskina O. O. Corpus-Based Research of Language: a Fashionable Trend or a Must? Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2015, no. 3, pp. 24–27. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25942817  
  9. Stubbs M. Words and Phases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell Publ., 2001, 288 p.  URL: http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-063120833X.html
  10. Inkpen D., Hirst G. Building and using a lexical knowledge-base of near-synonym differences. Computational Linguistics, 2006, vol. 32 (2), pp. 223–262. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/coli.2006.32.2.223
  11. Hirst G., Wang T. Exploring patterns in dictionary definitions for synonym extraction. Natural Language Engineering, 2012, vol. 18 (3), pp. 313–342. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1351324911000210
  12. Edmonds P., Hirst G. Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 2002, vol. 28 (2), pp. 105–144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089120102760173625
  13. Liu D., Espino M. Actually, Genuinely, Really, and Truly A corpus-based Behavioral Profile study of near-synonymous adverbs. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2012, vol. 17 (2), pp. 198–228.  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.2.03liu
  14. Peirsman Y., Geeraerts D., Speelman D. The corpus-based identification of cross-lectal synonyms in pluricentric languages. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2015, vol. 20 (1), pp. 54–80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.03pei
  15. Moon R. Braving Synonymy: From Data to Dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography, 2013, vol. 26 (3), pp. 260–278. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ect022
  16. Sorba J., Goossens V. How the lexical fixedness affects the treatment of synonymy among the semantic area of anger. Linguicae Investigationes, 2016, vol. 39 (1), pp. 1–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/li.39.1.01sor
  17. Liu D. Salience and construal in the use of synonymy: A study of two sets of near-synonymous nouns. Cognitive Linguistics, 2013, vol. 24 (1), pp. 67–113. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0003
  18. Comer M., Enghels. R, Vanderschueren C. Measuring the degree of near-synonymy of Spanish verbs of putting A multivariate corpus analysis of poner and meter. Functions of Language, 2016, vol. 23 (3), pp. 279–304. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.3.01com
  19. Carapic D. Near-synonymy analysis of the descriptive adjective "debeo, -la, -lo" in Sebian and its English couterpart "fat". Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 2015, vol. 51 (3), pp.  375–410. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2015-0008
  20. Vinogradova O. E. Directed Associative Experiment for Describing Word Semantics. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2013, no. 161, pp. 66–73. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19638914  
  21. Schank C., Abelson R. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structure. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publ., 1977, 248 р. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/806a/cad10715c2746948f646a28a46545af58188.pdf
  22. Kasevich V. B. Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka, (eds). Semantic and Lexical Universals. Studies in Language, 1997, vol. 21 (2), pp. 411–416. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sl.21.2.07kas
  23. Aitchinson J. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. 4th ed., Oxford, New York, Wiley-Blackwell Publ., 2012, 352 p. URL: http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-EHEP002242.html
  24. Kasevich V. B. Cognitive Linguistics: In Search of Identity. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Culture Publ., 2013, 193 p. (In Russian). URL: https://rucont.ru/efd/300069
  25. Belov V. A. Types of Synonymic Rows. Issues of Psycholinguistics, 2014, no. 22, pp. 125–137. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22698922
  26. Kozyrev V. A., Chernyak V. D. Synonymous lexicography: traditions and trends. Bulletin of Cherepovetsc State University, 2015, no. 1, pp. 32–38. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23442106
  27. Kolaiti P., Wilson D. Corpus Analysis and Lexical Pragmatics: An Overview. International Review of Pragmatics, 2014, vol. 6 (2), pp. 211–239. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00602002
  28. Pynn G. Pragmatic contextualism. Metaphilosophy, 2015, vol. 46 (1), pp. 26–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/meta.12120
Date of the publication 30.12.2017