Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, No.2, pp.20-33
UDC: 
378+378.14.015.62

Methodology of simulation and gaming in professional training of linguists at a Chinese university

Ishutina I. A. 1 (Shaoxing, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China), Salosina I. V. 2 (Tomsk, Russian Federation)
1 Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
2 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
Abstract: 

Introduction. The objective of this research is to demonstrate the need for simulation / gaming methods in professional training of linguists at a Chinese university. This issue has not been studied in much detail because it is connected to the current modernization of Chinese higher educational system. Nowadays China and Russia are developing collaboration in different spheres, including education. The main purpose of the article is to provide a theoretical framework, develop and implement a system of game-based method for increasing educational results in the process of professional training of linguists at Chinese universities.
Materials and Methods. The methodology of this study is based on the ideas of active learning in the context of higher education established by E. A. Allen, A. A. Verbitcky and game theory formulated by A. Fejes, K. Johansson, and A. P. Panfilova. The authors provide a theoretical framework based on the analysis of works by M. N. Viatiutnev, T. V. Vasilieva, and G. M. Levina devoted to theory and methods of teaching Russian as a foreign language.Our qualitative methodology included interviews with teachers and students, research literature review, and analysis of educational outcomes.
Results. Firstly, the authors analyze the content and structure of simulations and role plays with the main focus on linguistic training at the Chinese university. Secondly, the authors discuss the action research carried out at Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages. Finally, the authors provide recommendations for Russian as a Foreign Language teachers who work at Chinese universities without authentic language environment.
Conclusions. The authors prove the effectiveness of professional simulations and role plays in professional training of linguists in spite of the fact that teachers at Chinese universities prefer more traditional methods of language teaching (textbook-based exercises and lectures). However, the following factors must be taken into consideration: the peculiarities of educational system in China, and the degree of motivation and willingness of university teaching staff and students to use new teaching methods.

Keywords: 

Gaming simulation; active learning through play; role-playing; simulation; foreign-language communicative competence; interactive methods; Chinese students

For citation:
Ishutina I. A., Salosina I. V. Methodology of simulation and gaming in professional training of linguists at a Chinese university. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, no. 2, pp. 20–33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1702.02

References: 
  1. Vasilieva T. V., Lyovina G. M., Uskova O. A. Once more about сommunicative competence. Russian Language Abroad. 2012, no. 4, pp. 17–23. (In Russian)
  2. Kosheleva E. Yu, Pak I. Ya., Chernobylsky E. Learning in culture and culture of learning: Socio-psychology of Chinese students’ learning behaviours. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education. 2013, vol. 4, pp. 68–71.
  3. Gulakova M. V., Kharchenko G. I. Interactive educative methods in institutions of higher education as pedagogical innovation. Koncept. 2013, no. 3, pp. 31-35. (In Russian)
  4. Bimurzina I. V. Innovative technologies in the development of the communicative competence of foreign students learning Russian. TSPU Bulletin. 2013, no. 13 (141), pp. 39–42. (In Russian)
  5. Pidkasisty P. I. Didactic game as means of the organization of problem-based learning in high school. Modern high school. 1982, no. 1, p. 38. (In Russian)
  6. Pidkasisty P. I., Ahmetov N. K., Haidarov G. S. Game as means of activation of educational process. Soviet Pedagogic. 1985, no. 3, p. 22. (In Russian)
  7. Selevko G. K. Classification of educational technologies. Siberian Pedagogical Journal. 2005, no. 4, pp. 87–92. (In Russian)
  8. Lehtomäki E., Moate J., Posti-Ahokas H. Global connectedness in higher education: student voices on the value of cross-cultural learning dialogue. Studies In Higher Education. 2016, vol. 41, issue 11, pp. 2011–2027. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007943.
  9. Skyrme G., McGee A. Pulled in many directions: tensions and complexity for academic staff responding to international students. Teaching In Higher Education. 2016, vol. 21, issue 7, pp. 759–772. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1183614.
  10. Cheng M., Adeban Adekola O., Shah M., Valyrakis M. Exploring Chinese students’ experience of curriculum internationalisation: a comparative study of Scotland and Australia. Studies in Higher Education. 2016, pp. 1–12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1198894.
  11. Gram M., Jæger K., Liu J., Qing L., Wu X. Chinese students making sense of problem-based learning and Western teaching – pitfalls and coping strategies. Teaching In Higher Education. 2013, vol. 18, issue 7, pp. 761–772. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.836096.
  12. Simpson C. Language, relationships and skills in mixed-nationality Active Learning classrooms. Studies in Higher Education. 2015, issue 4, pp. 1–15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1049141.
  13. Blatner A. Enacting the new academy: Sociodrama as a powerful tool in higher education. RE:view: Rehabilitation Education for Blindness and Visual Impairment. 2006, vol. 28 (3), pp. 30–35.
  14. Rao D., Stupans I. Exploring the potential of role play in higher education: development of a typology and teacher guidelines. Innovations In Education And Teaching International. 2012, vol. 49, issue 4, pp. 427–436. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.728879.
  15. Lundy J. Cognitive learning from games: Student approaches to business games. Studies In Higher Education. 1991, vol. 16, issue 2, pp. 179–188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 03075079112331382964.
  16. Wouters P., van der Spek E. D., van Oostendorp H. Measuring learning in serious games: a case study with structural assessment. Education Tech Research Dev. 2011, vol. 59, issue 6, pp. 741–763. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9183-0.
  17. Ayling P. Learning through Playing in Higher Education: Promoting Play as a Skill for Social Work Students. Social Work Education. 2012, vol. 31, issue 6, pp. 764–777. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.695185.
  18. Osborn D., Costas L. Role-Playing in Counselor Student Development. Journal Of Creativity In Mental Health. 2013, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 92–103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 15401383.2013.763689.
  19. Stevens R. Role-play and student engagement: reflections from the classroom. Teaching In Higher Education. 2015, vol. 20, issue 5, pp. 481–492. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517. 2015.1020778.
  20. Fejes A., Johansson K., Dahlgren M. Learning to play the seminar game: students’ initial encounters with a basic working form in higher education. Teaching In Higher Education. 2005, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 29–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356251052000305516.
  21. Kniazev A. M., Odintcova I. V. System games in the reproduction of educational structures and relationships of the subject of professional activity. The World of Psychology. 2007, no. 3, pp. 197–207. (In Russian)
  22. Kniazev A. M. Basis of active learning through play. Moscow, Russian Academy of Public Administration Publ., 2006, 164 p. (In Russian)
Date of the publication 30.04.2017