Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 34–48
© Diner E. V., Mosunova L. A., 2017
UDC: 
37.025.8

Imagination development in the process of reading e-books

Diner E. V. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation), Mosunova L. A. 1 (Kirov, Russian Federation)
1 Vyatka State University, Kirov, Russian Federation
Full text (Open Access) — Downloaded 4249
Abstract: 

Introduction. The article provides an overview of completed research studies on reading psychology, revealing the changes in text perception psychology in a multimedia environment. The interaction of readers with information has changed with the proliferation of multimedia technologies. The number of people focused on the perception of images on the screen has increased. In this context, the problem of imagination development, which is linked to the symbolic nature of texts, is increasingly recognized. However, Russian and foreign researchers have not treated the problem in much detail. The article aims at analyzing the peculiarities of imagination mechanisms in terms of symbolic diversity of electronic texts and characterizing the ergonomics principle as a baseline to achieve the optimal combination of information signs in the e-book.
Materials and Methods. The research methodology is built on a system of basic principles, methods and concepts of psychological activity theory and the theory of speech activity. The methodology also includes the concept of imagination, the concept of e-books, and the principle of ergonomics. The content of the ergonomics principle within the framework of electronic communication is identified by means of the modeling method.
Results. The main results consist in clarifying the psychological features of electronic text perception. The article examines the topical issues of imagination development in terms of symbolic diversity inherent in electronic communication. The authors reveal the principles of holistic imagination development within the multimedia environment. It is emphasized that the replacement of the sign system in the video can lead to insufficient development of creative imagination, which is responsible for independent creation of new images, and mental transformation of reality.
Conclusions. The authors conclude that it is possible to overcome the reduction of imagination in the process of reading e-books in case of applying the ergonomics principle for its symbolic diversity. The content of this principle regarding e-book are examined. The feasibility of its application for symbolic components of e-books is experimentally proved. The authors provide a range of examples of experimental practical developments in the field of educational and popular e-books for primary school children. The authors argue that the ergonomics principle is aimed at achieving the required balance of information signs for optimal imagination development. Therefore, e-book content should be based on psychological aspects of electronic text perception.

Keywords: 

Reading; imagination; e-book; electronic manual; multimedia text; sign component; multimedia technology; ergonomics

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?src=s&origin=cto&ctoId=CTODS_1...

Imagination development in the process of reading e-books

For citation:
Diner E. V., Mosunova L. A. Imagination development in the process of reading e-books. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 34–48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1702.03
References: 
  1. Chudinova V. P. Tendencies and the content of the reading adolescents: possibilities of correction. Reading. XXI century. Collective monograph.  Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts  Publ., 2014, pp. 108–123. (In Russian)
  2. Chudinova V. P., Shapoval S. A. Kolosova E. A., Gubanova A. Yu., Armaderova E. A., Kosenko  L.  N. Reading Moscow teenagers in the real and electronic environment: a case study. Moscow, Interregional library cooperation center Publ., 2012, 144 p. (In Russian)
  3. Sorensen A., Hallinan M. Effects of ability grouping on growth in academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal. 1986, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 519–542.
  4. Williams Sh., McGee R. Reading attainment and juvenile delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology. 1994, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 441–459.
  5. Schwartz S. H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology. 1992, vol. 25, p. 165.
  6. Gueval J., Tarnow K., Kumm S. Implementing e-books: Faculty and student experiences. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2015, vol. 10, issue 4, pp. 161–185. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2015.06.003
  7. Cavallo G., Chartier R. A History of Reading in the j West. Amherst, University of Massachusetts press Publ., 2003, 488 p.
  8. Cordуn-Garcia J.-A., Alonso-Arevalo J., Gjmez-Diaz R., Linder D Towards a new conception of books and reading. Social Reading. 2013, pp. 7–75. DOI:  http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-726-2.50001-X
  9. Maxim A., Maxim A.-U. The Role of e-books in Reshaping the Publishing Industry. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012, vol. 62, pp. 1046–1050. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.178
  10. Melent'eva Y. P. About reading. (Reflections about the theoretical aspects of reading). Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2014, 184 p. (In Russian)
  11. Reading in the real and electronic environment: scientific reports: round table with international participation (18 Sep. 2014). Compiler E. Pavlovska; reviewer Stoyan Donchev. Sophia, For Bukvite – pismeneh Publ., 2014, 223 p. (In Bulgarian)
  12. Roskos K., Brueck J., Lenhart L. An analysis of e-book learning platforms: Affordances, architecture, functionality and analytics. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 2017, In Press. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.01.003
  13. Kör H., Aksoy H., Erbay H. Comparison of the Proficiency Level of the Course Materials (Animations, Videos, Simulations, E-books) Used in Distance Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, vol. 141, pp. 854–860. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.150
  14. Mulholland E., Bates J. Use and Perceptions of E-books by Academic Staff in Further Education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2014, vol. 40, pp. 492–499. DOI:  http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.05.018
  15. Bradshaw T., Bonnie N. National Endowment for the Arts. Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America: Research Division Report. no. 46, Washington, 2004, 60 p.
  16. Brushlinsky A. V. The problem of subject in psychological science. Moscow, Academic project Publ., 2000, 320 p. (In Russian)
  17. Raynard M. Understanding Academic E-books Through the Diffusion of Innovations Theory as a Basis for Developing Effective Marketing and Educational Strategies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2017, vol. 43, pp. 82–86. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.08.011
  18. Mosunova L. A. Current issues inpsychology of readingfiction. Bulletin of Vyatka state University of Humanities.  2012, no. 3 (1), pp. 162–171. (In Russian)
  19. Diner E. V. The principle of ergonomics: content and application of the e-book structure. Typographer. To help the Manager and chief accountant. 2015, no. 3 (69), pp. 16–26. (In Russian)
Date of the publication 30.04.2017