Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, No.2, pp.98-110
UDC: 
81’44+004.738.5

Directive abbreviations as a component of modern virtual communication (as exemplified in English and German languages)

Alekseev A. V. 1 (Rostov on Don, Russian Federation), Lenets A. V. 1 (Rostov on Don, Russian Federation)
1 Southern Federal University, Rostov on Don, Russian Federation
Abstract: 

Introduction. The process of information coding, which is caused both technically and socially, has already become obligatory for modern virtual communication. The purpose of the article is to analyse the reasons and ways of directive lexical reductions use in the process of virtual communication.
Materials and methods. The research is based on the illustrative examples of English and German abbreviations taken from Twitter and Facebook. The authors analyzed 1872 English and German lexical units relying on the method of continuous sampling it.
Results. The use of abbreviations demonstrates the economy of the communicants’ speech efforts. In the present research the reduced lexical units are treated from the position of speech acts theory. The reduced lexemes are classified according to the following main classes: directive abbreviation, commissive abbreviation, declarative abbreviation, expressive abbreviation, assertive abbreviation and questetive abbreviation. The class of directive abbreviations in virtual communication and the process of texting, where an essential feature is the transformation of communicants’ interaction at the language level, are considered in detail. The authors emphasize the obliquity of directive abbreviations in virtual communication. The group of directive abbreviations is divided into such subclasses as preventive, requestive and regulatory abbreviations.
The results of the research showed that participants frequently use regulatory abbreviations in virtual communication (in English and German). Frequent use of regulatory abbreviations by communicants is explained by their coding and obliquity. The high percentage of regulatory abbreviations is explained by the need of bilateral management of communication. Such prevalence of regulatory abbreviations in German-speaking virtual space is explained by national and cultural specifics of instructions (the bans and permissions) which regulate behavior of communicants in the German-speaking environment.
Conclusion. In conclusion the authors state that texting is a special type of virtual communication where speech efforts of communicants are economized.

Keywords: 

Abbreviation; speech acts; directive abbreviations; virtual communication; reduced lexemes; information coding; texting

For citation:
Alekseev A. V., Lenets А. V. Directive abbreviations as a component of modern virtual communication (as exemplified in English and German languages). Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, no. 2, pp. 98–110. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1702.07

References: 
  1. Abdelaty R. M.Abbreviations in specialized texts and the problem of their translation into Arabic – a model based on technical texts. Lebende Sprachen. 2015, vol. 60, issue 1, pp. 177–191. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10/1515/les-2015-0006. (In German)
  2. Arens Е. Die Bedeutung der Diskursethik für die Kommunikations- und Medienethik. Grundfragen der Kommunikationsethik. Funiok, Rüdiger (Hrsg.). Konstanz, UVK Medien Publ., 1996, pp. 73–96. (In German)
  3. Debatin B. Ethische Grenze oder Grenze der Ethik? Überlegungen zur Steuerungs- und Reflexionsfunktion der Medienethik. Aktuelle Entstehung von Öffentlichkeit. Akteure-Strukturen Veränderungen. Bentele, G. Haller, M. (Hrsg.). Konstanz, UVK Publ., 1997, pp. 281–290. (In German)
  4. Carbonell A. G, MacDonald P., Montero-Fleta B., Pérez-Sabater C. Linguistic needs in virtual communication and labour mobility: CoMoViWo Project. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015, vol. 212, pp. 316–322. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.380.
  5. Floridi L. Information Ethics: On the Theoretical Foundations of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology. 1999, issue 1 (1), pp. 37–56.
  6. Gonçalves P., Ferreira L., Gonçalves J., Putnik G.D., Cruz-Cunha M.M. Direct Communication versus Virtual Communication in Virtual Teams. Procedia Technology. 2014, vol. 16, pp. 3–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.062.
  7. Gorniak-Kocikowska К. The Computer Revolution and the Problem of Global Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1996, issue 2 (2), pp. 177–190.
  8. Gotterbarn D. Two computer-related codes. Writing a code of ethics. Illinois Institute of Technology. 1999, issue 19 (1), p. 186.
  9. Loretan M. Aktuelle Beiträge zur Begründung der Medienethik. Communicatio Socialis. Internationale Zeitschrift für Kommunikation in Religion, Kirche und Gesellschaft. Mainz, 2001, pp. 487–496. (In German)
  10. Searle J. R. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society. 1976, issue 5, pp. 1–23.
  11. Searle J. R. What is a speech act? Philosophy in America. Ed. Max Black. London, Alien and Unwin Publ., 1965, pp. 221–239.
  12. Tat M. J., Azuma T. Remembering txt but not text: The effect of context and lexicality on memory for text message abbreviations. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2016, vol. 37, issue 2, pp. 435–459. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000065.
  13. Wunderlich D. Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrcamp Publ., 1976, 417 p. (In German)
Date of the publication 30.04.2017