Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 73–85
UDC: 
81.37 + 81.367.622.14

Semantic shifts in abstract nouns

Kustova G. I. 1 (Moscow, Russian Federation)
1 Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract: 

The article's objective is to identify the types and mechanisms of semantic shifts in verbal names, show the factors influencing the change of lexical meanings. It is hypothesized that the types of semantic shifts are substantially related to the thematic class of the initial meaning. In turn the derived meaning of an abstract lexeme belongs to a different semantic class and has a new valency.
The paper deals with two types of semantic shifts:
(1) as a result of a shift to the area of modality the abstract noun acquires the ability to be followed by the infinitive (‘sense of events’ case) – net smysla bezhat’ (‘it makes no sense to run’);
(2) abstract noun acquires a valency “po + Dat.” as a result of shift to the area of “information” or “parameters”.
Abstract vocabulary may belong to various semantic classes: nepriyatnost’ (‘nuisance’, ‘trouble’, ‘annoyance‘), promakh (‘mistake’), razlad (‘discord’); referendum, soveshchanie (‘meeting’), turnir (‘tournament’); mery (‘measures’) / rabota (‘work’) / usiliya (‘efforts’) [po uregulirovaniyu (‘on settlement of’)] et al. These lexemes have much in common with words denoting mental states or propositional attitudes e. g. X thinks that Y, where Y is the content (theme) of the proposition expressed by a subordinate clause or by a prepositional group (X thinks about Y).
Abstract lexemes can have similar valency in prepositional phrases of po X [Dat.] type (po here means about, on, of), if: (a) there is a semantic shift to the "Information" area: trebovaniye soblyudat’ dogovor (‘the requirement to comply with the contract’) shifts to trebovaniya po soblyudeniyu dogovora (‘requirements on/of compliance with the contract’); (b) there is a shift of the lexeme into the "Information" area: raskol po probleme Iraka (‘split on Iraq issue’); (c) there is a shift of the lexeme into "Parameters" area: potrebnosti po gazu (‘gas demand’).

Keywords: 

Abstract vocabulary, infinitive, prepositional phrase «po + Dat.», valency of content, valency of theme, speech and mental semantics

https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85017584247&origin=...

Semantic shifts in abstract nouns

For citation:
Kustova G. I. Semantic shifts in abstract nouns. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 73–85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1602.06
References: 
  1. Apresjan Yu. D. Lexical semantics. Moscow, 1974, 367 p. (In Russian)
  2. Paducheva E. V. On the semantic derivation: word as a paradigm of lexemes. Russian language today. Moscow, 2000, pp. 395–417. (In Russian)
  3. Paducheva E. V. Dynamic models in the semantics of vocabulary. Moscow, 2004, 608 p. (In Russian)
  4. Paducheva E. V. Ontological categories of speech noun: the problem of categorical ambiguity. Scientific and Technical Information. Series 2. Information processes and systems, 2013, no. 4,
    pp. 18–29. (In Russian)
  5. Lyashevskaya O. N., Paducheva E. V. Ontological categories of emotion noun. Scientific and Technical Information. Series 2. Information processes and systems, 2011, no. 5, pp. 23–31. (In Russian)
  6. Kurilovich E. The problem of case classification. Kurilovich E. Essays on Linguistics, Moscow, 1962, pp. 175–203. (In Russian)
  7. Apresjan Yu. D., Iomdin L. L. Construction negde spat’: syntax, semantics, lexicography. Apresjan Yu. D. et al. Theoretical problems of Russian syntax: The interaction of grammar and vocabulary, Moscow, LSC Publ., 2010. (In Russian)
  8. Croft W., Cruse D. A. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2004, 356 p.
  9. Goldberg A. E. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 2006, 516 p.
  10. Linguistics of constructions. (ed.) Rakhilina E. V. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publ., 2010, 584 p. (In Russian)
  11. Kustova G. I. Constructions whis the conjunction chtoby: resources and correlations. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Issue 13 (20). Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2014, pp. 307–317. (In Russian)
  12. Glovinskaya M. Ya. (1996) Active processes in the grammar. Russian of twentieth-century end (1985–1995). (ed.) Zemskaya E. A. Moscow, 1996, pp. 237–304. (In Russian)
  13. Kustova G. I. Abstract lexemes’ valencies: reduction vs. specification. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Issue 14 (21). Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2015, pp. 307–317. (In Russian)
  14. Kustova G. I. The case frames of the predicates of interpretation and mechanism of compression. Verhnevolzhski Philological Bulletin. Yaroslavl’, 2015, no. 1, pp. 41–47. (In Russian)
  15. Apresjan Yu. D. Three-level government theory: lexicographical aspect. Apresjan Yu. D. et al. Theoretical problems of Russian syntax: The interaction of grammar and vocabulary, Moscow, LSC Publ., 2010, pp. 281–377. (In Russian)
  16. Iomdin L. L. Lexical entry of the word ON. Semiotics and Informatics, vol. 32, 1991, pp. 94–120. (In Russian) 
  17. Gorbov A. Number paradigms of abstract nouns in twentieth-century Russian: development trends and the influence of English. Russian linguistics. vol. 38, no. 3, 2014, pp. 23–46. (In Russian)
  18. Paducheva E. V. On attributive contraction of subordinate predication in Russian (1980). Paducheva E. V. Selected works. Moscow, 2009, pp. 145–172. (In Russian)
Date of the publication 10.04.2016